• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Tax consumption

Axismaster

Active member
Joined
Jan 6, 2006
Messages
296
Reaction score
1
Location
Michigan
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I don't know why we don't just abolish all those damn taxes, shrink the government, and tax consumption rather than income. Seriously, it would help the poor because they would have a ton more money, and provide enough money because we know how much Americans love to spend. Let's just abolish that damn IRS once and for all. Indeed, this is the best way because it would go right into your purchases and you wouldn't have to fill out tax forms.
 
It depends on what kind of "consumption" we're talking about. We'd find ourselves in the ugly position of having to either tax anything you buy, or showing favoritism toward some industries by exempting them. For example, a sales tax increase on college tuition would make it prohibitively expensive for many people. The same goes for buying a house or car. And food and medicine are already out, since it can be argued that it would unduly increase hardship for the poor.

I'm not sure the government should be discouraging consumption. It may not be the wisest move from a personal financial perspective, but it certainly does stimulate the economy and increase our country's financial well-being.

I agree that drastically cutting and flattening taxes are a good idea, but I don't think consumption taxes are the answer.
 
Kandahar said:
It depends on what kind of "consumption" we're talking about. We'd find ourselves in the ugly position of having to either tax anything you buy, or showing favoritism toward some industries by exempting them. For example, a sales tax increase on college tuition would make it prohibitively expensive for many people. The same goes for buying a house or car. And food and medicine are already out, since it can be argued that it would unduly increase hardship for the poor.

I'm not sure the government should be discouraging consumption. It may not be the wisest move from a personal financial perspective, but it certainly does stimulate the economy and increase our country's financial well-being.

I agree that drastically cutting and flattening taxes are a good idea, but I don't think consumption taxes are the answer.

In many places, food is not taxed. It would most likely be a merchandise tax. Even so, it would not hurt the poor because they wouldn't be paying any income tax anyway. That is a huge chunk less, and if we controlled inflation, it would really help them good.
 
Back
Top Bottom