• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tara Reade, who accused Joe Biden of sexual assault, defects to Russia

ClaraD said:
She wasn't under threat of being arrested, unless she failed to show up in front of Congress.
Click to expand...
The denials of dire plans for Reade are coming from the same party responsible for fast tracking legal complaints against Trump AFTER he declared his candidacy.
 
roguenuke said:
No, it isn't.

The issue is that she has been shown to lie. From the beginning she drastically changed her story, the one she told to the media, in so many ways. Then it was found in her own writings that they painted a completely different picture of what happened while she worked in Biden's office, which matched much more with her original accusation but still was more like a work of fiction, romanticizing and exaggerating her experiences to always make her being either the fierce but naive intern or just the victim of political games.

Why would they mention a testimony that is pure hearsay and doesn't even support her claims? They already got suckered into "well her mother called into this show revealing everything", when in fact, at best, her mother may have confirmed that Reade told her there was some "workplace harassment", "issues". Nothing more. Your side keeps trying to make both of these things much more than they are, especially when neither proves that even their claims of what she told them were true, when she could easily have lied to them so that she appeared to be the victim.

The people from his office swear that there is no evidence of what she claims happened, happening, and that what she claimed happened wasn't really what happened. Why should we believe her over so many others contradicting her claims about the sort of office environment she worked in was like? What credibility does she have over them? Because you want to believe her?
Click to expand...
Because, as I said, Biden gives every indication of being an unprincipled lout who's simply learned how to project the image of a kindly grandpa-- until, as Reade noted, he gets caught on a hot mike saying something like, "Nobody effs with a Biden."

And of course Biden has been caught in a lot of lies too, but you choose to ignore those.

Do you also choose to ignore Biden letting his hands grope Eva Longoria's hips a little longer than necessary? Maybe his statements about becoming more sensitive to "personal space" were just another pack o'lies.
 
ClaraD said:
and he cannot even argue that they would be afraid of losing their jobs...because that isn't in play anymore.
Click to expand...
You might have something if all the people who contradicted Reade had departed from any association with the political game. I've not seen that claim yet from the Dems; have you?
 
Ouroboros said:
The denials of dire plans for Reade are coming from the same party responsible for fast tracking legal complaints against Trump AFTER he declared his candidacy.
Click to expand...
Not proof of any such thing...just nothing but rumor and invented attacks from your side. You guys will make any shit up that sounds good and throw it at the wall to see if it sticks.
 
Ouroboros said:
Because, as I said, Biden gives every indication of being an unprincipled lout who's simply learned how to project the image of a kindly grandpa-- until, as Reade noted, he gets caught on a hot mike saying something like, "Nobody effs with a Biden."

And of course Biden has been caught in a lot of lies too, but you choose to ignore those.

Do you also choose to ignore Biden letting his hands grope Eva Longoria's hips a little longer than necessary? Maybe his statements about becoming more sensitive to "personal space" were just another pack o'lies.
Click to expand...
Except that he has never presented as "an unprincipled lout".

Biden has not been "caught" in any lies related to treating people in his office or even accusations against him. Those who have worked in his office, over decades, have all confirmed (none contradicted) that he was considered a good Senator as far as conduct was concerned, "safe". This was before he could have been called a "grandpa".

I don't need to ignore random events that I don't know about. I don't follow Biden around to measure in seconds how long he touches anyone.
 
watsup said:
Tara Reade is clearly a mental case.
Click to expand...
You must always believe the woman, don't you know. She probably moved there to save her life. Of course anyone who accuses Xiden of something has to be a mental case. Is his daughter a mental case too?
 
Patrick Henry II said:
You must always believe the woman, don't you know. She probably moved there to save her life. Of course anyone who accuses Xiden of something has to be a mental case. Is his daughter a mental case too?
Click to expand...

“Save her life.” *L*. You’re big on conspiracy theories, aren’t you.
 
Patrick Henry II said:
You must always believe the woman, don't you know. She probably moved there to save her life. Of course anyone who accuses Xiden of something has to be a mental case. Is his daughter a mental case too?
Click to expand...
Get it all out of your system.

Then go read up on the career grifter you are defending.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom