• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Talking points memo: GOP Telegraphs Mass Filibuster Of Obama’s Top Judges

Unitedwestand13

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
20,738
Reaction score
6,290
Location
Sunnyvale California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal

GOP Telegraphs Mass Filibuster Of Obama’s Top Judges | TPMDC

For background information this is the same appeals court that struck down Obama's controversial recess appointments.

this feels like a court packing scheme in reverse, the conservative faction of the republican party want to remove open seats on the D.C appeals court to keep the courts conservative bias and oppose any nominations that Obama suggests to fill the empty seats.
 
I hope the GOP finally grows a pair and obstructs Dear Leaders radical Left Wing destructive agenda

Don't even let him appoint a dog catcher
 
I hope the GOP finally grows a pair and obstructs Dear Leaders radical Left Wing destructive agenda

Don't even let him appoint a dog catcher

um they have been obstructing obama for four years, what gave you the impression that they have not been obstructing him?
 
um they have been obstructing obama for four years, what gave you the impression that they have not been obstructing him?

Democrats had full control for the first 2 years of Obama's Presidency

Now we're stuck with Obamacare. Like I said, Obstruct Obstruct Obstruct everything Obama
 

Quite possible. However, I think it's worth noting that Grassley has been undertaking these efforts sinc back when Bush was in offiec and would've been putting Conservative individuals into that seat. So at least for SOME during this process, it seems there may be a legitimate feeling of "waste" here rather than simply partisan posturing.
 

true.

but i feel that Grassleys sudden motivation for wanting to remove three empty seats just when Obama wants to appoint three new replacements and just after the D.C court struck down Obama controversial recess appointments is hardly a coincidence.
 

That's part of it. It's all part of it. Yes, we want to save money. Yes, the Republicans want to obstruct Obama at every turn. Yes, they'd much rather leave the court as is until their guy is in the WH.

I say call their bluff. Reduce the number of judges and then when there is a Republican President and they want to put those seats back in play, say no.
 

Really? I would think that it's absolutely a plausible notion that he would want to remove three EMPTY seats before they come FILLED seats, because if he believes they're unneeded then filling them would be a waste of money AND would result in someones job being lost if he got them removed later.

For someone with a history of attempting to remove seats from the DC bench, REGARDLESS of Republicans or Democrats in the white house making the appointments, I think you're going off partisan gut instinct to suggest that him attempting to remove seats from the DC bench must be political in nature.

While the seats are empty there's no one being paid for those positions, so they're essentially not there and as such would be, understandably in my mind, rather low priority to deal with. Once you're attempting to FILL those positions however it then raises the issues importance if you feel those positions are unneeded and wasteful.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…