• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Taking bets: when Trump ends up residing in Russia or in Israel: protection from criminal & civil exposure

Will Trump flee & end up residing in Russia or in Israel: protection from criminal & civil exposure?

  • Yes, the walls are closing in on Trump and he'll probably escape the U.S. permanently by summer 2024

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • A toss up, don't underestimate how Trump, RWE wealthiest GOP donors, politicians, cult base will go

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • Elections will result in most of Trump's legal exposure going away, Trump is politically protected

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, Trump is not leaving or even in serious legal or civil jeopardy, TDS ! TDS ! TDS !

    Votes: 2 40.0%

  • Total voters
    5

post

Lady of the house wonderin' where it's gonna stop
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 23, 2006
Messages
16,245
Reaction score
6,692
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Do you really expect Trump will just stay in the U.S., "absorbing," indictments, criminal convictions, and civil judgments?

Link to cached page of this article,
https://webcache.googleusercontent....again/+&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=opera

Trump toys with the mob — again - The Washington Post​

https://www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2022/01/30

Jan 30, 2022 — In Texas, Trump encouraged people to hold protests over his legal jeopardy and suggested he would pardon Jan. 6 rioters who took such a ...

February 21, 2022
emptywheel says:
February 21, 2022 at 10:11 am
Yup. I will deal with that and the Alex Jones reference separately. It’s what my nod to Mehta’s knowledge of non-public information was about.

Portugal probes granting of citizenship to Russian-Israeli ...​

https://www.timesofisrael.com › portugal-probes-granti...

Jan 15, 2022 — As a new citizen, Abramovich is exempt from taxes in Israel on income earned abroad for 10 years, and need not declare the sources of that ...

Abramovich is latest Russian oligarch to move to Israel​

https://apnews.com › Abramovich-is-latest-Russian-olig...

May 29, 2018 — Some were drawn by tax breaks for new immigrants to Israel. They are also more protected in Israel against the threat of extradition, ...

Note, The United States, Israel and their Extradition Dilemma​

https://repository.law.umich.edu › cgi › viewcontent

PDF
by SA Petkunas · 1990 · Cited by 3 — Like most extradition treaties,' 6 the 1962 U.S.-Israel Extradition. Treaty does not define a political offense. Because there is a lack of international ...
 
Trump will end up in jail one day after Joe and Hunter.
 
Let's come up with more and more ridiculous Trump-like memes so we don't have to spend time worrying about how Putin will de-stabilize Eastern Europe.
That is so much easier than tackling serious issues like immigration, drug overdoes deaths, corrupt politicians, incompetent presidents, etc.
 
This is a left-wing fan-fiction fantasy thread.
 
This is a left-wing fan-fiction fantasy thread.
Good luck with your sophomoric denial. Judge Mehta's ruling on the civil suits considers information that the DOJ has not publicly disclosed.

Judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
Incumbent
Assumed office
June 1, 2021
Appointed byJohn Roberts
"On July 31, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Mehta to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, ..."

February 22, 2022
".....This part of Mehta’s ruling is far more important than the conspiracy side. To understand why, consider some of the cases over which Judge Mehta is presiding.

LANDON COPELAND​

....

THOMAS WEBSTER​

....

SHANE WOODS​

.....

PETER SCHWARTZ​

.....

THE OATH KEEPERS​

"As I’ve noted repeatedly, Mehta is also presiding over the Oath Keepers, who all entered the East door and therefore would be among those kitted out people who violently pushed past Sidney Hemby. A few of the Oath Keepers are individually accused of assault. For example, video shows veteran Joshua James fighting with a cop in the Rotunda, screaming, “Get out! … This is my ****ing Capitol!”

But members of the Stack who pushed past Hemby as he was protecting that door are suspected of far more serious plans for assault. As Mehta noted in ruling for the pre-trial detention of Stewart Rhodes on Friday — the same day he issued this ruling — once the Stack broke into the Capitol, they split up, with part of the group trying to make it to the Senate and the other part going to Nancy Pelosi’s office.
The latter is of particular concern because, on Election Day, Kelly Meggs told his wife and kid he was “gonna go on a killing spree … Pelosi first.”
Judge Mehta has good reason to suspect (and likely knows far more about how serious this plot was) that the Oath Keepers, after busting into the Capitol past Hemby, took steps to hunt down Nancy Pelosi, and possibly someone in the Senate, like Pence.

When Judge Mehta says he thinks it is plausible that Donald Trump abetted assaults and threatened assaults at the Capitol, he’s not speaking abstractly. Judge Mehta has a very specific understanding of the kinds of assaults that happened that day. Those were violent attacks on cops — several allegedly committed by military veterans and one by a retired NYPD cop. Those include a gratuitous attack on the media. It includes an attempt to hunt down the Speaker of the House. With this ruling, Trump may be on the hook for such assaults civilly. But given that the judge presiding over some spectacularly assaults that day has judge that Trump’s actions may rise to an aid and abet standard, it may make DOJ more seriously consider Trump’s exposure for such acts criminally..."
 
Back
Top Bottom