- Joined
- Nov 30, 2011
- Messages
- 5,586
- Reaction score
- 2,420
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Due to the fact that most liberals want a big gov't, the current big governments actions regarding Syria should not be a surprise to them. Therefore, in the name of fairness, I'd like to say that it's your fault liberals that we are heading directly into another confrontation with a Middle Eastern country that hasn't actually done anything to us.
It's your fault liberals that, despite the outcries of their constituents, your left leaning Congressmen and women (not to mention your POTUS) are going to move forward with strikes against another Middle Eastern country that can sort out it's own problems. It should be especially troubling to you that Neocons such as John McCain and John Boehner are allying with you.
It's your fault liberals, that more servicemen and women will be put in harms way while launching munitions against another Middle Eastern country. Just because a Navy service member isn't being directly shot at, doesn't mean that a cruise missile can't blow up inside the launcher or detonate prematurely killing him and possibly sinking the whole crew.
It's your fault liberals that you have put us in the situation where we could get sucked into a naval and/or air battle with Russia.
Finally, yes, it's a war. Don't try to call it a "limited strike" or any other crap like that. Why? Because the question you have to ask yourself is this. If another country launched cruise missiles at us, what would it be called? WAR. That's what it would be called. But, in liberalese, launching missiles against a country that can't retaliate is called "limited strikes" or some crap like that. This is going to be a war, no two ways about it. Boots don't have to be on the ground for it to be a war.
It's your fault liberals that, despite the outcries of their constituents, your left leaning Congressmen and women (not to mention your POTUS) are going to move forward with strikes against another Middle Eastern country that can sort out it's own problems. It should be especially troubling to you that Neocons such as John McCain and John Boehner are allying with you.
It's your fault liberals, that more servicemen and women will be put in harms way while launching munitions against another Middle Eastern country. Just because a Navy service member isn't being directly shot at, doesn't mean that a cruise missile can't blow up inside the launcher or detonate prematurely killing him and possibly sinking the whole crew.
It's your fault liberals that you have put us in the situation where we could get sucked into a naval and/or air battle with Russia.
Finally, yes, it's a war. Don't try to call it a "limited strike" or any other crap like that. Why? Because the question you have to ask yourself is this. If another country launched cruise missiles at us, what would it be called? WAR. That's what it would be called. But, in liberalese, launching missiles against a country that can't retaliate is called "limited strikes" or some crap like that. This is going to be a war, no two ways about it. Boots don't have to be on the ground for it to be a war.