- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 23,909
- Reaction score
- 11,003
- Location
- New Jersey
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Ahh I see you no longer can discuss this matter politely. Shame, I was hopeing for a few more baseless generality statements.Only the extremely stupid. People like you.
But you continue on never the less....You'll have to return to yer usual activity of playing with yerself. I won't waste any time after this post responding to yer childish twatery.
Interesting...Only to morons.
:lamoAnd you are one.
Please continue on... very nice...Oh yes, you've stated it. Yer wrong. Yer an idiot.
By all means, since your argument so far on the subject matter has zero evidence or substance and is below coloring book level.I can choose to ignore you, and I will from now on.
So you disparage gay people too! Who knew!"Sweetie"? Yer confusing me with the man yer currently sleeping with.
It (sadly) benefits you as well. Yer too stupid to see that.
I think you leftist socialists should start voting for Republicans, they seem to do more for you than the people you elect.
I have admit that was a well done retort....
Oh whah. Conservatives are pissed because six out of nine justices refused to deny health insurance to millions of Americans over a minor drafting error.
The pain. The pain.
If Hillary … the Repubs nominate one of their better candidates
SCOTUS did the GOP a favor.
ObamaCare isn't going to morph into a good law. Its not going to get better or cheaper with time.
Its not going to turn into the lies and misrepresentations that the Democrat party and the President fed to the American citizens before they shoved this monstrosity down our throats.
Its substantial impact on the economy isn't going to diminish, and now its the Democrats law all over again.
If SCOTUS had ruled the other way it would be up to the GOP to " fix " the unfixable.
Then, anything and everything from that point on would have been blamed on the GOP.
Since they don't have a veto proof majority they couldn't have passed effective legislation anyway.
Lefties are celebrating ? Why ?
This law was so unpopular, so hated that it was unmentionable during the 2014 midterms by any Democrat that wanted to keep their jobs.
I agree.... on one hand, we have a forward thinking party that actually gets things done; on the other hand we have a party that refuses to live in the reality of the present and continually tries to legislate us into the past. As one once said "When I want to go forward, I put the car in "D" and when I want to backup, I put the car in in "R", I find this works in the voting booth, as well."
The problem is that it's the R's that keep creating the mess.
That kind of overconfidence can lead to defeat.
Mapping the 2016 Electorate: Demographics Don't Guarantee a Democratic White House
The problem is that it's the R's that keep creating the mess.
Did the Roberts/Kennedy Libertarian wing of the USSC just throw an electoral lifeline to the GOP--as they did with VRA and CU 1.0/2.0?
Surely they knew the GOP would explode apart with what to "REPLACE" ACA for millions.
Now, the GOP has their 2010/2014 issue intact without having to act .
Agreed. The court did the GOP a huge favor.
The can continue to make hay out of this by confusing the ill-informed electorate, which they (and particularly Faux News) do so well...
...at this point, the GOP can not ever repeal this without a well articulated REPLACE. Since they will be unable to ever agree upon and articulate one, the PPACA is here to stay.
I wouldn't be too proud of the fact that Republicans were happy to let people die for lack of health care. It's a sick chapter in American political life, and one Republicans should let fade away as quickly as possible.
At least you are admitting that Hussein Obamacare can be repealed with a well articulated plan. That's a start.
Yea, a realist and not an ideologue like the wingnuts of the court. I'm impressed.
At least you are admitting that Hussein Obamacare can be repealed with a well articulated plan. That's a start.
Even if Hillary wins, there are going to have to be changes.
The Obama lemmings haven't figured that out yet, and with the likely event of a Republican majority in congress, I would say Obama's version is headed for a toilet
Yah! And maybe we'll be back to the good ol' days and take away health insurance from 20 million Americans and it'll be GREAT!!!!
Care to expand on that? The thing is, it's a three-legged stool. Remove one of the legs, it all topples.
--Everyone is covered. No exeptions for pre-existing conditions, etc.
--Everyone pays for their insurance. No free-loaders who jack up the costs for the rest of us.
--Subsidies for those who need help paying the premiums.
Those are the essentials. Everything else are add-ons.
That is classic sour grapes. Yes, all those activist judges appointed by conservatives that are lying in wait to write liberal legislation. Forgive my laughter. I know its rude.
The reality is that if you bring a frivolous lawsuit, which this was, you get shot down 6 to 3, with the only 3 votes from activist justices. The only reason this went to the SOCTUS was so they could write a comprehensive decision to take away the idea that you could look to the courts to undo legislation. This is what they did: shut down the courts as a method of killing/hurting the PPACA.
Its time to work WITH the bill, as options to work against it are all but gone.
It's not even close to being Constitutional, lol...
No rational, informed, honest person would conclude that it is Constitutional. Only corrupt, dishonest, activist jurists would approve it. Exhibit A: The SCOTUS. All 9 need to be impeached.
Are you saying the conservative SCOTUS is legislating from the bench?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?