• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme Court Turns Back Effort By MyPillow CEO lindell to Toss $1.3 Billion Defamation Suit

Liberal7360

Liberal7360

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 16, 2021
Messages
7,292
Reaction score
11,773
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
The my pillow guy will be facing that lawsuit.

The supreme court rejected his effort to stop it.

He knows he will be financially ruined yet he continues to spew the lies. It's nuts.

It will be interesting to see how all this turns out.

 
Goes to show how "activist" and "leftist" the SCOTUS is, when they allow a God fearing, loyal Trump supporter like The Pillow Guy to be so harassed by a socialist voting machine company.

He doesn't spew lies, he tells the truth, the machines WERE rigged to give Biden more votes than Trump, not to mention the entire election was rigged against Trump.

The Pillow Guy is only doing what any good clean God fearing American would do, exposing the corruption in the Deep State, Democratic Party, the Globalist cabal, and the MSM.

MAGA!!
 
Liberal7360 said:
The my pillow guy will be facing that lawsuit.

The supreme court rejected his effort to stop it.

He knows he will be financially ruined yet he continues to spew the lies. It's nuts.

It will be interesting to see how all this turns out.

Click to expand...

I have no pity for Mike Lindell. He is a lunatic who betrayed his country. He does not deserve to call himself an American.

He is paying the price for being a trump-stooge.
 
Liberal7360 said:
The my pillow guy will be facing that lawsuit.

The supreme court rejected his effort to stop it.

He knows he will be financially ruined yet he continues to spew the lies. It's nuts.

It will be interesting to see how all this turns out.

Click to expand...
Good.

I hope Lindell ends up sharing a cardboard box home with Alex Jones.
 
Too bad. So sad.

Loser
 
Who says the SCOTUS is a tool of the GOP now?
 
I hope Lindell gets some badly needed therapy and any necessary medications
 
I don't believe that Lindell has won one time with the courts over the last couple of years. His lawsuits against Dominion and Smartmatic were thrown out. Link
Now Lindell has to face lawsuits from both Dominion and Smartmatic. Link
 
I hope he gets a good night's sleep.
 
eman623 said:
Then why didn't they accept this case?
Click to expand...


The court can reject this case and I can still believe they are a tool of the gop.

This one case doesn't mean that they aren't a tool for the gop.

Many of the cases in the past scream they are a tool for the gop.

Citizen United is a very good example. So is the dobbs ruling. Same with all the rulings that has dismantled the voting rights act and affirmative action and so many others.
 
SNOWFLAKE said:
Goes to show how "activist" and "leftist" the SCOTUS is, when they allow a God fearing, loyal Trump supporter like The Pillow Guy to be so harassed by a socialist voting machine company.

He doesn't spew lies, he tells the truth, the machines WERE rigged to give Biden more votes than Trump, not to mention the entire election was rigged against Trump.

The Pillow Guy is only doing what any good clean God fearing American would do, exposing the corruption in the Deep State, Democratic Party, the Globalist cabal, and the MSM.

MAGA!!
Click to expand...
So to prove this case the offender have to prove the voter machines were working properly and were not rigged or hacked in any way. If any machines were tampered with, operated irregularly, or were hacked, then the claims would possibly be true by Lindel. There is a lot of supposed evidence floating around out there so we shall see what we shall see.
 
Liberal7360 said:
The court can reject this case and I can still believe they are a tool of the gop.

This one case doesn't mean that they aren't a tool for the gop.

Many of the cases in the past scream they are a tool for the gop.

Citizen United is a very good example. So is the dobbs ruling. Same with all the rulings that has dismantled the voting rights act and affirmative action and so many others.
Click to expand...
Or when the court ruled 8-1 that Trump had to turn over some docs to the J6 committee back in January. Seems like a strange thing for a "GOP tool" to do.

The court definitely has a conservative leaning majority now. But I guess the SCOTUS is only a tool of the GOP when they do something you don't like.
 
Integrityrespec said:
So to prove this case the offender have to prove the voter machines were working properly and were not rigged or hacked in any way. If any machines were tampered with, operated irregularly, or were hacked, then the claims would possibly be true by Lindel. There is a lot of supposed evidence floating around out there so we shall see what we shall see.
Click to expand...
What's YOUR theory? Tampered machines? Rigged machines? Clean machines? Terminator machines? YOU DO HAVE A THEORY, don't you??
 
eman623 said:
Who says the SCOTUS is a tool of the GOP now?
Click to expand...
They are not a tool of the GOP. They are however a solid voting block of 5 radical Catholics devoted to adherence to Catholic Canon Law and 1 conflicted Catholic on the Right. I would not depend on them to vote to benefit Donald Trump or anybody like Donald Trump. In fact they have been turning Trump and his ilk away more often than not. Notice as well that the actually Conservative as opposed to phony Conservative Justices of the 11th circuit shot holes through Trump's hand picked judicial hack in Judge Cannon.

At the same time, I would not depend on the devout Catholics of the SC to vote to protect Voting Rights or Contraception or anything to do with Reproductive Rights either. One of them, Clarence Thomas believes that minorities must improve and must suffer to improve. How Catholic of him.

While I would tend to applaud seeing the SC put it to Pillow Boy or anybody else that had to do with Trump's Coup plot, using Religious fervor to do it does nothing for me. The Constitution and its Amendments should be good enough for the task at hand.
 
jnug said:
They are not a tool of the GOP. They are however a solid voting block of 5 radical Catholics devoted to adherence to Catholic Canon Law and 1 conflicted Catholic on the Right. I would not depend on them to vote to benefit Donald Trump or anybody like Donald Trump. In fact they have been turning Trump and his ilk away more often than not. Notice as well that the actually Conservative as opposed to phony Conservative Justices of the 11th circuit shot holes through Trump's hand picked judicial hack in Judge Cannon.

At the same time, I would not depend on the devout Catholics of the SC to vote to protect Voting Rights or Contraception or anything to do with Reproductive Rights either. One of them, Clarence Thomas believes that minorities must improve and must suffer to improve. How Catholic of him.

While I would tend to applaud seeing the SC put it to Pillow Boy or anybody else that had to do with Trump's Coup plot, using Religious fervor to do it does nothing for me. The Constitution and its Amendments should be good enough for the task at hand.
Click to expand...
It's entirely possible to object to abortion on non-religious grounds.

For example, the Catholic Church also unconditionally opposes capital punishment. But you don't see this court overturning a lot of last minute death penalty appeals that reach it.

Seems the theory that they are devoted to adherence to Canon law doesn't quite fit the facts.
 
Integrityrespec said:
So to prove this case the offender have to prove the voter machines were working properly and were not rigged or hacked in any way. If any machines were tampered with, operated irregularly, or were hacked, then the claims would possibly be true by Lindel. There is a lot of supposed evidence floating around out there so we shall see what we shall see.
Click to expand...

🤣

No, that's not how any of this works.
 
Liberal7360 said:
The my pillow guy will be facing that lawsuit.

The supreme court rejected his effort to stop it.

He knows he will be financially ruined yet he continues to spew the lies. It's nuts.

It will be interesting to see how all this turns out.

Click to expand...
Why is the Supreme Court even hearing this garbage?
 
eman623 said:
It's entirely possible to object to abortion on non-religious grounds.
Click to expand...
Absolutely. But the fact is, if not for the religious crowd out there just trying to punch their own tickets to heaven, the anti-choice movement would have no political power in this country whatsoever.
 
Integrityrespec said:
So to prove this case the offender have to prove the voter machines were working properly and were not rigged or hacked in any way. If any machines were tampered with, operated irregularly, or were hacked, then the claims would possibly be true by Lindel. There is a lot of supposed evidence floating around out there so we shall see what we shall see.
Click to expand...
Ah, another Trump U lawyer. No they don't.
 
eman623 said:
It's entirely possible to object to abortion on non-religious grounds.

For example, the Catholic Church also unconditionally opposes capital punishment. But you don't see this court overturning a lot of last minute death penalty appeals that reach it.

Seems the theory that they are devoted to adherence to Canon law doesn't quite fit the facts.
Click to expand...
Wow, the Catholic Church voiced its unconditional opposition to capital punishment all the way back in .........2018. I'm impressed. NOT!!!!

Two weeks after the Catechism was changed, 45 Catholic scholars and clergy signed an appeal to the cardinals of the Catholic Church, calling on them to advise Pope Francis to retract the 2018 revision made to the Catechism, on the grounds that its appearance of contradicting scripture and traditional teaching is causing scandal.

Even that later than late bunch of Vatican Blather has met with resistance in the Church. I would say capital punishment from renowned practitioners of same, LIKE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, is at best, a toss up and the SC has treated it like a toss up.

Oh and I don't find any practical evidence that the Vatican has put its money where its pen is regarding the treatment of capital punishment in the 2018 revision of the Catechism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom