• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme Court agrees to hear 2d Amendment case involving NYC firearm transport restrictions

Common Sense 1

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
17,416
Reaction score
12,127
Location
United States
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Private
It seems this would be narrow in it's scope but still a very important case.

Supreme Court agrees to hear 2d Amendment case involving NYC firearm transport restrictions

https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/01/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-2d-amendment-case-involving-nyc-firearm-transport-restrictions/

SCOTUS hasn’t taken a 2A case in almost a decade. Does this signal that the right to keep and bear arms will no longer be “this Court’s constitutional orphan” (as Justice Thomas once wrote)?

The Supreme Court just agreed to hear a challenge to a New York City law barring transport of lawfully owned firearms except to one of six licensed firing ranges. The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York.
 

Toggle Almendro

DP Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2016
Messages
2,379
Reaction score
1,018
Location
Michigan
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Thank you Republicans for putting Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. The Constitution is back in business.
 
Top Bottom