You have not proposed anything that would do that except for repealing the second amendment.
Yep. As I said, you better get started on the Constitutional Amendment first. The last one took 202 years.
What makes you think "the national executive"- given the power to exempt any gun- will concede to your wishes on exemptions?
.jpg)
The 27th Amendment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
On this date, the First Congress (1789–1791) submitted the original 12 amendments to the Constitution, crafted by Representative James Madison of Virginia, to the states for ratification. Two years later, the states approved 10 of the amendments and, thus, created the Bill of Rights. The states...history.house.gov
how many mass shootings are there and how many people die from them? you claim that you push gun bans not for the purpose of decreasing crime. Your motivations are of dubious validity it appears
He wants all guns to be banned and then pretends that the president who just signed that gun ban might exempt a few. Its like many things =you give people certain powers and when you have no recourse to modify what they do, you won't see them unban anything. Its a dishonest and ridiculous law he wants
Business owners and supermarket workers and patrons.
Citizens do have the right to ban all firearms, in their own homes.
If they're qualified to carry, sure.
What I meant was, good armed patrons.
If they would wise up and either have armed security on staff or allow customers to carry, or both, it would stop bad stuff from happening, such as shootings.
you want to rape the rights of over 80 million people to pretend you will stop things that are mainly perpetrated by people who don't care about dying and which cause very little harm in the USA yearly
Well, until she has actually been made a hostage to an assault rifle owner, no ones Right have been abridged, but should she actually be made hostage to anyone including an assault rifle owner, I would fully support taking that individuals assault rifle, or any other weapon away from them by whatever means found necessary.
Sunny Hostin: ‘I feel like a hostage’ to assault rifle owners
“The View” co-host Sunny Hostin said she feels “like a hostage” to Americans who own assault rifles while arguing resistance to reform measures from gun rights activists is …thehill.com
She is 100% right. the majority of these assault-rifle owners are not putting "country first." They are putting their own perverted self-interest ahead of what is best for the country.
Freedom is not the ability to own these killing weapons. That is not what freedom is all about.
The government is actually the owner, not the soldier. The soldier is merely issued a rifle, like any other piece of equipment. If the soldier loses or damages their equipment they could be held financially accountable, but the government still remains the actual owner of the equipment. The only thing the soldier can call their own is their basic government issue uniform (which officers have to buy anyway). Everything else is returned back to the government upon separation of service.
yep
??? I linked it in the post you questioned.
Follow it back. The Amendment was one of twelve originally proposed. Ten of them were adopted as what we now call the Bill of Rights. Two weren't adopted. It took 202 years for the 27th Amendment to be ratified and made part of our Constitution.