- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 31,645
- Reaction score
- 7,598
- Location
- Canada, Costa Rica
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I just did.Do you go around saying things like that in public?
I just did.
Maybe you didn't understand what was said. Should I rephrase it for you?
Perk.....MIKA.
Give her to me for 30 days and when I am finished with her. She will return a die hard Republican. :lamo
You can only debate someone who has a basic understanding of a topic, and claiming that the Canadian system has no costs....or that everyone in the US has been forced into the ACA, shows that you have little to no knowledge of either system. Further, claiming that "no insurance" is better than having subsidized basic coverage, when most of those who now have coverage when before they had "no coverage" due to cost/preexisting conditions...is ironic writ large."Ignorance"?
Of what? Your stupid system?
That's jealousy talking. Your idol strutted out all his promises and the ignorant bought it, only to find out 1] you could not keep your plan and 2] at the end more people than live in my country will have NO coverage.
Show me where your Obamacare with it's premiums, bureaucracy, pre-approvals and bull**** is even in the same league as what most of the rest of the industrialized world has. At the end of the day you're still 30th or something, behind Cuba and Canada.
The methods leave more than a little on the table, shouting "ignorant" is actually childish and kind of proves the intent of this thread, the "stupid" bought into this abortion of a law.
Your counter is still a failure, for a 3rd time....because you have, as always, forgotten what the point was that you were supposed to counter:I noticed how you missed mentioning the state legislatures. But that was to be expected. Just sayin
Oh, you can't read. I said that GOP guvs were choosing not to set up state exchanges.....and you bring up 2 state exchanges where those guvs DID in fact try to setup exchanges...where the private contractors failed to do what they were hired to do.....and you think that applies to the context I was speaking about.
FFS...again, stick to C&P, when you go out on a limb and start making argument without the crutch, you fall down REALLY hard.
It's easy to type messages anonymously using a online idenity.
If you tried saying that in person, face to face, that is a recipe for getting injured.
That's just another reason why there has to be education reform.
So then Gruber and the rest of the people who had a hand in the ACA should be looking over their shoulders?
Yeah, it was supposed to be a secret.
No, many of the people on this thread probably don't have the courage to say hateful things in person.
Which has what to do with the architect of the ACA letting it be known that the ACA crafters relied on the stupidity of people to push their pet project through?
Grant's comment was not nearly as offensive as that.
So then Gruber and the rest of the people who had a hand in the ACA should be looking over their shoulders?
No, but I just wanted to comment on how easy it is to call someone stupid online and not suffer phisical injuries.
That would seem to be the case.
The lesson seems to be that when one of their own calls them stupid no offense is taken. When someone outside the party agrees with Gruber then they get offended.
And all day long, day in and day out, people say **** on here that they wouldn't say in public. What made Grant's comment so noteworthy?
Because, after last Tuesday, I have had it with conservatives curb stomping everything I stand for.
I am confronting the issue now.
He didn't have to say it, he relied on it.I wonder what threads on here would look like if Dick Cheney went around saying that they relied on the "stupid American voters" when they decided to invade Iraq....
The ACA wasn't an election issue last Tues.This has nothing to do with last Tuesday. This wasn't an election issue. It was about the ACA. That passed long before last Tuesday.
Your anger and frustration should be directed at those who lied to you and the American people, and have been lying for the past six years.No, but I just wanted to comment on how easy it is to call someone stupid online and not suffer phisical injuries.
Personally, I have no problem with right to work legislation and allowing a worker to opt out of union membership if they choose to. Perhaps if unions hadn't simply become financing arms of the state and federal Democrat parties, and concentrated solely on workplace issues and worker protection, more people wouldn't opt out of union representation. As it stands, the teachers, one of the most militant of political unions in Wisconsin, saw over 30% of their members opt out of union membership. That speaks a great deal to the need for the reforms Walker and the Republicans brought to the table.
Your counter is still a failure, for a 3rd time....because you have, as always, forgotten what the point was that you were supposed to counter:
Respond with a comment that counters the point, stop C&P'ing NON SEQUITURS.
An alternative is to take a second look at what you've been standing for. Maybe an adjustment in your philosophy can be made. It happens to most people.Because, after last Tuesday, I have had it with conservatives curb stomping everything I stand for.
I am confronting the issue now.
My god this is fu**ing mind numbing. Voter turnout was historically low. Not just generally low across the board, but there were relatively fewer Democrats actually voting. This isn't a case of "Americans waking up." There is no indicator that Republicans actually pulled a significant number of Dems or independents. Americans were even more asleep than usual for a mid term election. Don't let your skirts get blown too far up your backside. It was a wave election. Obama is not running in 2016. This wasn't about Democrats or Liberals. It was about Obama. Even Republicans didn't really care that much about this election. You can expect a higher percentage of Democrats to get out and vote in the general election, that is something you can count on. What that means is that Republicans are going to have to shine like diamonds for the next 24 months or they will likely see their gains dissipate. You can bet the Dems will be mobilizing in 2016.
Stop ignoring election trends and come back to reality.
37% and yet almost every Republican campaigned on Repeal of BO care.....yet each won running on that Platform. While the Democrats ran away from the so called Leader's Signature legislation.....even had Manchin and some looking to dial it down on their own. Imagine that.
Now round 2 of BO's enrollment is up and a whole lot more people have lost coverage.
Moreover now with a BO Bot Architect and the admitting that BO and Team tricked the CBO.....intentionally. Tricked the American People, and Lied to the SCOTUS. Just how do you think BO's Team will be looked upon in the Highest Court in the Land?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?