• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Stop the Slaughter of Our Children With These Weapons of War

dave8383 said:
But it didn't work:
Click to expand...

Trump is a tyrant and we live in a tyranny ?

Well Trump shows a complete disregard for the Constitution.

Some observers have suggested he may refuse to accept the result of November's election should he lose and be voted out of office. Then we'll have a constitutional crisis.



"Flush the turd, on November third"
 

you make many statements-yet no one ever backs you up.. You lie and lie and lie some more and claim a victory. Such as your claim that Reagan signed the Brady bill or that a rifle is the same as a shotgun or that an AR 15 is a "weapon of war" "designed for HEAVY combat"

your posts are the epitome of clueless
 

in order to stop all the idiotic lies about AR 15s, gun banners, liberals, and gun controllers should be prevented from talking about these rifles. Especially if you post nonsense that proves you haven't a clue about what you are talking about.
 
TurtleDude said:
in order to stop all the idiotic lies about AR 15s, gun banners, liberals, and gun controllers should be prevented from talking about these rifles. Especially if you post nonsense that proves you haven't a clue about what you are talking about.
Click to expand...

The biggest nonsense about the AR15 is that there's a big difference between it and the M16/M4. There isn't.
 
dave8383 said:
The biggest nonsense about the AR15 is that there's a big difference between it and the M16/M4. There isn't.
Click to expand...

lawmakers disagree-and there is almost no difference between the AR 15 and dozens of other rifles that shoot the same or similar cartridge including the several HUNDRED THOUSAND MI carbines that our own government sold lots of us civilians (including the four I bought from the DCM)
 
Rich2018 said:
Trump is a tyrant and we live in a tyranny ?
Click to expand...

dave8383 said:
I think Trump and his administration meet some of the definitions, but not all of them.
Click to expand...

Well dave, you must be terrified beyond belief by the progressive wing of the Democrat party in comparison. Trump's one strange, uncouth MF'er, but we have a presumptive Democratic frontrunner and an increasing swath of a disaffected electorate who literally (or collectively, if you prefer) believes that we have to destroy the country (and perhaps even modern civilization) in order to save it.
 
Last edited:

If you have a deadly infection you can't be afraid to use the mother of all antibiotics.
 
dave8383 said:
If you have a deadly infection you can't be afraid to use the mother of all antibiotics.
Click to expand...

sounds like the vietnam lie-destroy a village to save it. the only infection I see is the constitution hating left
 

No paradigm huh?

:2wave:
 

Who is that and what is your criteria for "destroy" ?
 
Rich2018 said:
So if a tyrant isn't like Trump, they're not a tyrant ?

Do you understand what "criteria" means ?
Click to expand...

I don't think this is all that important. I wasn't writing a thesis, just playing around on a forum on the net. I could define tyrant, and break it down, and point to where Trump qualifies, and where he doesn't, yet, but you're being way too serious for me to bother.
 

I don't think you can point to anything where Trump qualifies as a tyrant.

I'm not sure you can state a clear criteria for being a "tyrant" in the 1st place.
 
Rich2018 said:
what is your criteria for "destroy" ?
Click to expand...

In this instance, a combination of social and/or policy-oriented sympathy for: the nationalization of banking and major industry; the devaluation or dissolution of individual sovereignty, freedom, and liberty of the citizenry; the elevation of immutable characteristics as the primary means of determining value and virtue; the forcible instantiation of outcome over opportunity; the abandonment of objectivity; the presumptive, selective wisdom with which to dictate without challenge. It is in practice a form of theocracy, only without the additional variable of constituting a ridiculous appeal to the idea of the supernatural. I'll have none of it, and you shouldn't either.
 
TurtleDude said:
what does "heavy combat" have to do with the Heller paradigm?
Click to expand...

So where's all your nonsense about a "Heller Paradigm"? You just throw that out there like it means something; like Scalisa didn't know what he was talking about.
 

There maybe some mad-cap evangelists in favor a theocracy but which relevant (meaning standing a chance of election) politician has proposed the nationalization of the banking industry ?
 
Rich2018 said:
which relevant (meaning standing a chance of election) politician has proposed the nationalization of the banking industry ?
Click to expand...

Bernie Sanders has specifically said in the past that he "favors public ownership of banks, utilities, and major industries." Some of his current campaign's sentiments, policy proposals, and consulting relationships clearly reinforce the aforementioned statement, along with other worrisome considerations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…