• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Steve Schmidt: "My fidelity is to my country, not my political party. Country first."

Xelor

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
10,257
Reaction score
4,163
Location
Washington, D.C.
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
This past week, George Will and Steve Schmidt, two long, long standing Republicans abjured the GOP for one and only one reason: The GOP's and Trump's turpitude.


 
It is always good to see a man of conscience speak out! Bravo!
 
Oh please both were rabid never Trumpers from day one. Yawn again......
Have you ever listened to Schmidt on Morning Joe? If you have it will be very
clear what is going on.
 
Oh please both were rabid never Trumpers from day one. Yawn again......
Have you ever listened to Schmidt on Morning Joe? If you have it will be very
clear what is going on.

The Bushes are still rabid Never-Trumpers. The state of Utah seems to be rabid Never-Trumpers.

Pat Buchanan and Rand Paul are Libertarians and one just doesn't know who they'll throw their support to. Some things just don't change.
 
Schmidt is one of the few political talking heads that is always well spoken and has something of value to say. He is intelligent and very much aware of what America is and what is happening to it under Trump.
 
While I've heard plenty of folks laud and decry Schmidt's remarks. I have yet to hear anyone present a cogent refutation of his basis for arriving at his decision about the GOP.



There's another way to look at the exodus of people from the GOP...To the extent they align with the Democratic party, they may effect change in that party, making it more conservative than it is. They may even foment within it the sort of schism that roils the GOP.
 
Schmidt is one of the few political talking heads that is always well spoken and has something of value to say. He is intelligent and very much aware of what America is and what is happening to it under Trump.

I'm truly surprised that Republicans have blindly followed this narcissistic monster with their heads buried into the sand.
The Party of Lincoln,the GOP no longer exist!
 
Dear, perhaps you should actually read the post. :roll:

He pretended to know what Reagan would think.

Come on, you can do better than that.

What was there in what we know about what Reagan believed that would indicate he would be a Trumpkin?
 
I wouldn't indicate either way -- it's dishonest.

Why is it dishonest to apply the beliefs and action of Reagan to the beliefs and actions of Trump? I would suggest that is what Schmidt is doing and there is nothing dishonest about it.
 
This past week, George Will and Steve Schmidt, two long, long standing Republicans abjured the GOP for one and only one reason: The GOP's and Trump's turpitude.

So Trump is a bridge too far but Palin was fit to be VP? Okay.

Glad people are calling Trump out, but why did they help it get this bad in the first place?
 
Why is it dishonest to apply the beliefs and action of Reagan to the beliefs and actions of Trump? I would suggest that is what Schmidt is doing and there is nothing dishonest about it.

Because it's a practice in dishonest to put words in the mouths of the dead. We simply don't know what they would make of our current circumstances -- they would likely have evolved alongside the rest of society and have the benefit of hindsight at this point.
 
Why is it dishonest to apply the beliefs and action of Reagan to the beliefs and actions of Trump? I would suggest that is what Schmidt is doing and there is nothing dishonest about it.

Reagan was a moral man.
Trump is a immoral heartless narcissist.
Reagan would be sick if he knew Trump was President
 
This past week, George Will and Steve Schmidt, two long, long standing Republicans abjured the GOP for one and only one reason: The GOP's and Trump's turpitude.

He has all the self-righteousness necessary to qualify for the democrat party.
 
Trump is the result of two things; the leftward shift of the Democrats and the fecklessness of the GOP. The answer to Trump isn't to move the GOP leftward or abandon it. It is to move it back to conscientious conservatism. The GOP needs hard working, principled conservatives willing to actually get things done. Trump has gathered together conservative ideas and wrapped them up in populism and brash aggressiveness. After Bush and the weak efforts to beat Obama, people responded to it, including quite a few blue collar Democrats. Anyone leaving the GOP and joining the Dems is jumping from the frying pan into the fire. They will either have to give up their conservatism or be completely marginalized.
 
So Trump is a bridge too far but Palin was fit to be VP? Okay.

Glad people are calling Trump out, but why did they help it get this bad in the first place?

Schmidt has been anti Trump from the beginning. His leaving the GOP is just grandstanding and him looking for approval from his pals at MSNBC
 

It's simple if Republicans want to save their party,they have to Dump Trump!
In the end Trump is more a disaster to the GOP then to Democrats.
 
Schmidt has been anti Trump from the beginning. His leaving the GOP is just grandstanding and him looking for approval from his pals at MSNBC

Schmidt should stay a Republican and be Anti-Trump
 

I do not disagree that such a practice can be dishonest. And when it is done, one must look closely at it. But in the case of Schmidt, I do believe he makes a very thorough and reasonable case that the party of Reagan is not the party of Trump and Reagan would not recognize it today.

You talk about opinion evolving over time. Why then has George Wills not evolved to accept Trump? Why hasn't the recently departed Charles Krauthammer not evolved to do the same? What about Nicole Wallace? What about Joe Scarborough? Lots and lots of Reagan era and Bush era people simply have not evolved to accept Trump.
 
Reagan was a moral man.
Trump is a immoral heartless narcissist.
Reagan would be sick if he knew Trump was President

I agree with that. I would also point out that Reagan was a man of governmental experience as Governor of our largest state while Trump is verdant-government as an institution. Sure Reagan was a conservative who wanted smaller government in many areas - but he had respect for it as an institution. Trump has no such respect.

In fact. Trump respects nothing other than Trump. he uses everything like toilet paper.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…