• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Stein Misses Recount Deadline in PA

It means that she's going to have to sue for the recount and that involves coming up with some evidence of fraud. While that's unlikely to happen this election has broken every other rule so why not that one too.
 
Maybe if it's about electoral integrity she can take her millions and efforts to a Clinton state that she won by a narrow margin?
 
That's going to send a lot of people who were really hoping the election might be flipped through the roof. Even if MI and WI were somehow turned, that still leaves Trump at 280.
 
Oh, well... I guess I better get out to CVS and get a couple boxes of tissues. My liberal friends and family are not going to take this well.
 
I want to feel a sense of relief...
But, I do not underestimate their corruption like they "underestimate"/understate Trump..
 
Stein should be feeling like the Naderite she is and real DEMs should abandon her.

PA picked up a DEM governor in 2014 who would have been a better VP candidate.

DEMs should have held their convention in OH not PA.

My fellow DEMs need to move on, become the loyal opposition, and prepare for 2018.

Do exactly what the GOP did after the 2008 election .
 
Lutherf said:
It means that she's going to have to sue for the recount and that involves coming up with some evidence of fraud. While that's unlikely to happen this election has broken every other rule so why not that one too.
Click to expand...

Exactly which "every other rules" were broken in this election.

This is actually the cleanest EC win when the PV was lost.

Only DEMs have won the PV, 4 out of 49 times, and lost the POTUS.

Time to move on and pray trump doesn't blow up the ****in planet .
 

Enough with the popular vote nonsense. I'd really like that looked into by the way.

Trump won 31 states to Hillary's 19. Democrats are losing governorships and legislative seats at an astonishing rate. That's far more telling of where the nation is right now.

I do hope Soros spurs on this nonsense further. It's only sealing the future fate of liberals even further.
 

That was a figure of speech and refers to the fact that pretty much nothing in this campaign was normal.
 
Lutherf said:
It means that she's going to have to sue for the recount and that involves coming up with some evidence of fraud. While that's unlikely to happen this election has broken every other rule so why not that one too.
Click to expand...

Good luck getting a court date [of this magnitude] before inauguration day.
 
WCH said:
Good luck getting a court date [of this magnitude] before inauguration day.
Click to expand...

If I remember correctly, PA was also the largest margin of the recount states. It would have to be one hell of hacking job to overturn 70k votes.
 

You obviously didn't notice that I support the EC along with the problems DEMs have had since the 2010 election.

The sooner DEMs remove GOP whipping boys the better .
 
Lutherf said:
If I remember correctly, PA was also the largest margin of the recount states. It would have to be one hell of hacking job to overturn 70k votes.
Click to expand...

I think it was over 100,000.

Democrat suggested throwing out FLorida's electoral votes in 2000 but, that would only lessen the plurality.
 
Last edited:
Lutherf said:
That was a figure of speech and refers to the fact that pretty much nothing in this campaign was normal.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say that on the DEM side, which had another 2-way race like 1980 that divided the party and sent the Midwest to Reagan.

As for trump, he is the Nixon/Agnew of the 21st century, so lots of similarities .
 
Cardinal said:
Yeah, when I read the hoops she'd have to jump through I was like, "Yeah, that's not happening."
Click to expand...

if the election actually was hacked, that would be up to the NSA to release, because they would be the ones who would know for sure. this other stuff just seems like a waste of money. punkinhead won the electoral vote, and that's how it stands.
 
Lutherf said:
It means that she's going to have to sue for the recount and that involves coming up with some evidence of fraud. While that's unlikely to happen this election has broken every other rule so why not that one too.
Click to expand...

And then there are the hard time limits for doing anything after she had won the court battle.

Of course for the elite trying to claim that they do things well so THE REBELLION should have never happened recounts are embarrassing from the jump.
 
Helix said:
if the election actually was hacked, that would be up to the NSA to release, because they would be the ones who would know for sure. this other stuff just seems like a waste of money. punkinhead won the electoral vote, and that's how it stands.
Click to expand...

Ayup.

For the record, not being able to verify the vote with a recount is fantastically irresponsible.
 
Harshaw said:
That's going to send a lot of people who were really hoping the election might be flipped through the roof. Even if MI and WI were somehow turned, that still leaves Trump at 280.
Click to expand...

I wanna watch that.
 
If there was no popular vote for the Senate, the GOP would have over 60 Senators. So thank you TR/WJB for the 17th.

Erod said:
Enough with the popular vote nonsense. I'd really like that looked into by the way.
Click to expand...

If you think the PV is nonsense, why do you want to look into it. You are voicing trump--the election is only honest if I win.

PV in each state determines EVs. Welcome to the Constitution.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…