• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

States Want to Ban Abortions Beyond Their Borders.

SENSIBLE PATRIO said:
That is a horrible reply! Both engage, both should have say in the life!
Click to expand...
If men simply keep it in their pants, they won't need to demand a say for anything!

(Is this not logically consistent with some who say that if women would stop having illicit sex there'd be no abortions? Same principle - stop being sluts, men, and carelessly slinging your sperm about!)
 
Cope said:
Im sure if a doctor was going to do it they would come up with some reason it was necessary. I also know that there is likely to be non-doctor abortions performed.
Click to expand...
Non doctors could not perform a third trimester abortion.

The fetus at that late stage , needs to deliverd either through the a c section or the birth canal because the head and skull are too well formed . The skull cannot be crushed before delivery. If the fetus is viable it will be delivered alive.
 
Last edited:
code1211 said:
Why did you amputate a shred of a thought and present it was if it was a whole thought?
Click to expand...
Maybe I can only entertain a shred of a thought or maybe I was focusing in on a specific thought and releasing the rest to oblivion.
 
SENSIBLE PATRIO said:
The woman knows the consequences also, but gets all the say, even though she agreed to have sex! So the man is not equally represented under the law!
Click to expand...

THe man has all the 'say' he wants. He just needs to 'say' before they have sex, just like she does. After that, both should be held accountable for the risk they CHOSE to take.

The man knows all this before deciding. So why shouldnt he be held accountable for his decision?
 
roguenuke said:
And if a woman is so desperate to end the life of a growing fetus during the 3rd trimester without any medical reason to do so, then there has to be some mental health issues there. She is definitely putting her own life at risk doing almost anything herself to end that pregnancy at that point.
Click to expand...
Yes, she was mentally ill and was in a psych facility after this happened.
 
Gordy327 said:
Is repeating that nonsense over & over supposed to mean something or are you going to address the point made?
Click to expand...

I am asking you a question. Do you understand the concept of asking a question?
 
Bodhisattva said:
Maybe I can only entertain a shred of a thought or maybe I was focusing in on a specific thought and releasing the rest to oblivion.
Click to expand...

The entire post was only a single thought. I'm sorry to hear about your limitation.
 
Gordy327 said:
There is nothing equal about pregnancy. When the man gets pregnant, then it will be equal. Until then, only the woman has a say.
Click to expand...
That is a chickenshit answer! Also means nothing, that child is as much a part of him as her!
 
SENSIBLE PATRIO said:
That is a chickenshit answer! Also means nothing, that child is as much a part of him as her!
Click to expand...
It's NOT in his body. THAT is why he gets no say in whether she aborts or carries to term. jfc
 
SENSIBLE PATRIO said:
That is a chickenshit answer!
Click to expand...
Chicken shit is small... if you want to make a statement of effect it should be "that is an Elephant Shit!!"
SENSIBLE PATRIO said:
Also means nothing, that child is as much a part of him as her!
Click to expand...
It is not a 50/50 split... but that starts getting into minutia that I am sure you don't want to talk about.

What matters is where the child is developing. It is in the woman.. not that man.
 
Gordy327 said:
Your question makes no sense.
Click to expand...

It makes perfect sense. What part has you confused?

Here it is again:

Why did you amputate a shred of a thought and present it as if it was a whole thought?
 
code1211 said:
It makes perfect sense. What part has you confused?

Here it is again:

Why did you amputate a shred of a thought and present it as if it was a whole thought?
Click to expand...
Still a stupid question and presumptuous.
 
code1211 said:
It makes perfect sense. What part has you confused?

Here it is again:

Why did you amputate a shred of a thought and present it as if it was a whole thought?
Click to expand...
Good grief. It is proper format on debate forums to quote only the part(s) you are responding to.
 
Gordy327 said:
Still a stupid question and presumptuous.
Click to expand...

It's a direct question asking why you edited away the context of the post and presented a shred instead of the whole thought.
 
Scrabaholic said:
Good grief. It is proper format on debate forums to quote only the part(s) you are responding to.
Click to expand...

I disagree with the practice, think it is rude and will not respond to those who go to the extra effort of editing away the context to change the thought of my post.
 
code1211 said:
It's a direct question asking why you edited away the context of the post and presented a shred instead of the whole thought.
Click to expand...
I did no such thing. I simply addressed the point made.
code1211 said:
I disagree with the practice, think it is rude and will not respond to those who go to the extra effort of editing away the context to change the thought of my post.
Click to expand...
That's your problem then. There's nothing wrong with responding to specific points within a statement or post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom