• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

States Can't Count Covid Test/ Mail-In Ballot Management No Issue

VySky

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
49,357
Reaction score
19,599
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Do you really trust states which can't accurately count Covid-19 test? Still want them responsible for your mail in ballot?

Really?

Look no further than this epic blunder to confirm many expert opinions that mail-in ballots are problematic

-VySky
 
What an assine comparison!!!:roll:
 



Look no further than the decades of proof of no mail-in ballot problems that there are no mail-in ballot problems.
 

Problematic to trumps re-election chances.
 

Where is you example and link?

Just a note, if people want to vote by mail what is yiur problem with it, isn't it their chance to take. If it is truely as bad as you claim, it's not, then why does trump mail his. Maybe the USPS should make sure at least One vote does get lost, the one associated with the person trying to put them out of business.
 

Trump opposes it. His word is their command.
 
Casper said:
True, they will support him no matter what he says or does. The definition of a Cult.
Click to expand...
Ridiculous. We have been fighting Democrat voting fraud for more than 50 years. Not a sudden change.

If you want to vote by mail you can request an absentee ballot. A chain of custody is maintained. You can do that now.

Printing and mailing a ballot for every registered voter......what could possibly go wrong? How many languages? Braille? What happens to all those sent to the dead letter? What happens to those sent to the dead? When a municipality has 130% of population as registered voters do they get the full bonus count?
We just shut down a country for a disease with a .26% overall mortality rate. .4% of those symptomatic. Lets make vote fraud as rare.

Audit the vote.


Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 

Yet when asked to produce evidence of these high rates of voter fraud it is never forthcoming.
Some States are trying to limit just anyone requesting a mail in ballot, mine is one that is going through the Court's as we speak.
It is rare, very rare.
 

States can mail ballots if the voter requests a mail in ballot. If the voter doesn't request a mail in ballot, states shouldn't mail the ballot.
 

Bull****. The only time anyone gets caught actually casting illegal votes, it is a right winger doing it.
 
Casper said:
Yet when asked to produce evidence of these high rates of voter fraud it is never forthcoming.
Some States are trying to limit just anyone requesting a mail in ballot, mine is one that is going through the Court's as we speak.
It is rare, very rare.
Click to expand...

Remember when the loser in the White House said he was sending his "best" people to find the 2 million illegal votes Hillary got to beat him in the popular vote? They must still be hanging out with his "best" people he sent to Hawaii to prove Obama's birth certificate was fake.
 
Republicans are scared that more people will vote, as that means more people will most likely vote against their precious. if Captain Orangey McCheeseCake loses, i think that we might experience secession idiocy again. there are some terminally undereducated morons out there.
 
More people not eligible to vote will vote. Getting out the vote is all good; manufacturing the vote is not.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Eriech said:
More people not eligible to vote will vote. Getting out the vote is all good; manufacturing the vote is not.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Utter, unsupported nonsense. Let us know when Utah goes blue.
 
Casper said:
Yet when asked to produce evidence of these high rates of voter fraud it is never forthcoming.
Some States are trying to limit just anyone requesting a mail in ballot, mine is one that is going through the Court's as we speak.
It is rare, very rare.
Click to expand...
We must rely on those that count the vote that there was no fraud. There are very many corrupt precincts in this country with one party rule on both sides.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
Your post is replete with idiocy and false claims.
 
This is my understanding of the process, based on an interview. I believe it was the MI secretary of state, but I could be mistaken.

Applications are mailed which require a signature upon their return. A ballot is sent, which also requires a signature. Ballots are processed electronically, and the first thing checked, after the bar code is scanned, is the signature. A signature doesn't change in five months, and the software is powerful enough to reject any forgeries directly. That was for MI (IIRC). I'm sure other states use similar systems.
 
Last edited:
Eriech said:
We must rely on those that count the vote that there was no fraud. There are very many corrupt precincts in this country with one party rule on both sides.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

So you cannot site is real cases just speculation and accusation. Must be a hell of a way to go through life
 
Eriech said:
We must rely on those that count the vote that there was no fraud. There are very many corrupt precincts in this country with one party rule on both sides.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

No, we rely on machines to count the votes, like we have for decades. Mail-in ballots don't go to individual precincts, to be counted by hand.
 
The rules for elections are based in state law, and they have been as long as states have had legislatures with authority but that authority extends far and wide.

Do you trust states that screw up covid counts, trash state budgets, butcher efforts to figure out which cons to parole and which not to, and which kids to remove from abusive homes and which to return to their parents, and who produced the laws on who currently eligible for state Medicaid funding, to write the statutes on which the death penalty is sought and decide what kinds of crimes should warrant mandatory minimums and which should be covered under three strike laws?

Is an argument for law and order, throw away the key, and capital punishment really based on a history state competence in governance, or it is based on the fact they are the only ones we have to trust to do this job at all?
 
Eriech said:
More people not eligible to vote will vote. Getting out the vote is all good; manufacturing the vote is not.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

thanks for the scary imaginary right wing voter suppression horse**** argument, but no thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…