• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

State Dept. Says Moscow’s Ukraine Diplomacy Was a ‘Pretense’ (1 Viewer)

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
101,324
Reaction score
91,328
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent

iu

2.25.22
WASHINGTON — The Biden administration said on Friday that Russia was never serious about finding a diplomatic solution to the crisis over Ukraine, and that weeks of back-and-forth between Washington and Moscow amounted to a sham as the Kremlin prepared for war. “Moscow engaged in the pretense of diplomacy,” the State Department spokesman, Ned Price, told reporters at a daily news conference. “It now appears quite clear that Russia was not, and has not been, interested in genuine diplomacy.” Mr. Price’s words were the most definitive statement yet by the Biden administration that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had not dealt in good faith, even as Russian diplomats repeatedly met face to face with their American and European counterparts. Washington and Moscow also exchanged multiple rounds of formal documents on European security. The assessment was a departure from assertions made by U.S. officials in recent months that, despite the Russian forces amassing along Ukraine’s border, Mr. Putin remained undecided on whether to order an invasion.

President Biden noted in public remarks last month that the widely accepted truth was that Ukraine was “not very likely” to join NATO anytime soon. Charles A. Kupchan, who was Europe director of the National Security Council in the Obama White House, said Mr. Putin’s muted response to such talk suggested that more explicit proposals to keep Ukraine out of NATO would have been futile. As Russian forces closed in on Kyiv this week, the issue of Ukraine’s neutrality was raised once again — this time by the country’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, in a televised address. Looking depleted and wearing a simple T-shirt, Mr. Zelensky rallied his fellow Ukrainians against the Russian attack. But he also had an offer for Mr. Putin, hinting that his country might at last drop its ambitions to join NATO. “We are not afraid to talk about neutral status,” Mr. Zelensky said. Mr. Putin had no reply.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has now been sanctioned by the West.

In hindsight, Lavrov's Kremlin task was to engage in sham diplomacy to gain time while ever more Russian battalions encircled Ukraine.

 

iu

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has now been sanctioned by the West.

In hindsight, Lavrov's Kremlin task was to engage in sham diplomacy to gain time while ever more Russian battalions encircled Ukraine.

Well, what was anyone going to do about it anyway?

Duh, they knew it, but how much time did they give him?

And how much time do we?
 

iu



Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has now been sanctioned by the West.

In hindsight, Lavrov's Kremlin task was to engage in sham diplomacy to gain time while ever more Russian battalions encircled Ukraine.


I really don't see why the Russian leadership would need to engage in " sham" negotiations in order to give themselves more time. They have probably been planning this attack for months or even years
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom