• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

State Dept. inspector general report sharply criticizes Clinton’s email practices

antiquity

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
3,967
Reaction score
1,330
Location
Northwest Peninsula
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...6f8ebc-2275-11e6-aa84-42391ba52c91_story.html

I want Hillary to explain this away...
 
Rules are for the commoners. We're talking about not just a member of the political class here but an elite member. In that rarefied air you get to make the rules, not be subjected to them.
 
Rules are for the commoners. We're talking about not just a member of the political class here but an elite member. In that rarefied air you get to make the rules, not be subjected to them.

Course if you read the entire article it goes on to state secure handling of certain materials has been spotty for years. The report is also quite critical of Colin Powell but some of we seem to ignore/'miss/ use partisan blinders while skimming over that part... eace
 

I really get tired of "well he did it too!"

It was during Powell's tenure that OpenNet first became available though, apparently, the system at that time didn't allow for long term electronic records preservation. While Powell (and his staff) should have printed and saved their emails there is no indication that classified information was sent through personal accounts. Clinton, on the other hand, opted not to use department system at all. This decision was made 5 years after Powell left the position and well after email became a necessity rather than an option.
 

I can understand your 'tiredness', howsomever fact is THE REPORT IN THE OP was highly critical of Colin Powell... this ain't a 'well he did it too' it is QUOTING the SAME report that some think is 'highly' critical of Hillary... :doh

FYI OpenNet COULD 'allow' long term storage- that ability has been available for decades prior to Powell's term in the State dept- they simply chose not to, I guess incorrectly thinking hard copies would be maintained. The pattern wasn't who used what new technology- but the State dept long history of spotty record keeping...

I'm really getting tired of only partisan partial reading of reports by a few blinder wearing people... eace
 

The report did more than that . It made public a certain e-mail exchange between Hillary and Huma that proves she tried to lie her way out of this scandal

She created the server for convenience, remember ?
 
The report did more than that . It made public a certain e-mail exchange between Hillary and Huma that proves she tried to lie her way out of this scandal. She created the server for convenience, remember ?

The article never mentions any such exchange... where was that?

FYI the exchange between Luther and i was over his partisan attempt to paint Hillary as the only one criticized in the report as some above the law politician...

remember???? eace
 

Sure I read the link, did you ? Apparently not.

State department employees were having problems receiving Emails from Clinton.

Huma suggested she use a Govt Email account. Hillary said no, because she didn't want anyone to access her personal emails

How would anyone gain access to her personal emails if they were on a Govt server?

She admitted setting up the server to circumvent FOIA, not because she wanted the convience of using one device

She's a bald face liar and you dont get to decide what gets posted here. If it contradicts your Hillary obsession then too bad.

If you dont like it stop supporting and defending low lifes
 

Laughing, I'm not the one with a Hillary obsession. Hillary wanted a separate address for her 'business' email to keep her personal stuff personal. She had requested 'obama' blackberries but was denied them by the NSA.

Now, given the numerous hacks, leaks and outright thief of government emails (Snowden ring a bell?) you can't think her worry wasn't unfounded... :roll:

I can see where she didn't want any comments she makes in emails being used later like the comments some state dept people made about European leaders during the Snowden revelations.

Keep up the whiny right partisan crap fest... eace
 

Well, Colin Powell didn't use his own private, in-home email server to conduct 100% of his state department business, nor did he decide which of his emails would become part of the public record, and which would not.
 

Two wrong don't make a right....
 
The report did more than that . It made public a certain e-mail exchange between Hillary and Huma that proves she tried to lie her way out of this scandal

She created the server for convenience, remember ?

I think Hillary created the server in her home to avoid her email being read by others. No other SOS had done that. So comparing Hillary to Rice or Powell who didn't have a home bound server to hide their emails from the public is apples and oranges....What other reason would there be?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…