• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

State Department: We will release Hillary's emails.... in January of 2016

cpwill

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Messages
81,903
Reaction score
45,028
Location
USofA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
HAH. Now that's interesting. Hillary is rather famous for being extremely difficult to work for, I wonder if she pissed off the wrong staff members in the relevant shop, or if this is coming from senior Kerry's staff. Either way, it's fun



That's odd. She told us she went through and removed all the personal ones. Gosh. I wonder how the process missed the personal emails when she explicitly told us it was designed to remove personal emails.

...The Iowa caucuses are due to be held Feb. 1, 2016 — just two weeks after the proposed release of Clinton’s emails....
Click to expand...

:lol: :mrgreen:
 



Guess she can't blame Republicans......huh? :2razz:
 
Yeah she is going to be real pist now.....knowing the Repubs put up the evidence on the GOP Website, that she lied about with having another email account.



Back when questions about Hillary Clinton's secret server first came to light, her lawyers stated unequivocally that with the exception of a few days at the very beginning of the first Obama administration, Secretary Clinton exclusively used one email account ("hdr22") throughout her tenure at State. In response to a records request from Congressional investigators, Hillary's lawyer asserted that a separate email account ("hrod17") "is not an address that existed during Secretary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State." Thanks to the Times story and the Blumenthal hack, we now know that statement to be false. The RNC published the evidence on its website last evening, posting screen caps of email exchanges from Hillary Clinton using "hrod17" in 2011 and 2012, prior to her departure from State in 2013. One example:



For her part, Mrs. Clinton (who is an active candidate for the presidency) has not fielded a single question from the news media in 28 days:


Jennifer Epstein ✔ ‎@jeneps As Hillary Clinton got in this red van, @edhenrytv shouted: "why won't you answer any questions?" 5:06 PM - 18 May 2015....snip~

Uh Oh: Hillary Used Private Email Address Her Lawyers Claimed Didn't Exist - Guy Benson
 

Love the timing. Its apparent there isn't much love for her in the white house.
 
US Conservative said:
Love the timing. Its apparent there isn't much love for her in the white house.
Click to expand...

We are still 17 months away from the election. Never underestimate a politician's capacity for understanding the best time to break negative news. If it is something they are pretty sure is going to break at some time, they will break it early, like now, so that all the brouhaha will happen now and be over with when the campaign really starts ramping up. Then a few months down the road when somebody brings it up, all it will accomplish is a big yawn as 'old news' and not worth the time to worry about.
 



What does she do with Gowdy waiting to call her to testify at least twice. Its clear he would have to wait until after Iowa just for the first one. Which wont stop more from coming out with the emails released in January.
 

You are right, but in this case its not Hillary making the timing decision, its the administration-and I dont think they are huge fans of Hillary.

Perhaps they are holding her "hostage", saying keep quiet and dont criticize the regime or we will end your campaign.

Or perhaps they are trying to make it old news, but its bound to be in the press if its coming out just before the nomination.
 
MMC said:
What does she do with Gowdy waiting to call her to testify at least twice. Its clear he would have to wait until after Iowa just for the first one. Which wont stop more from coming out with the emails released in January.
Click to expand...

Gowdy is a remarkable guy and rising star in the Republican party. One of the very best I've seen in his ability to conduct a productive hearing and articulate a reasoned opinion. And so far he has not been able to even ruffle Hillary's feathers--she's half of the Teflon duo, remember? So I'm pretty sure if he delays the hearings and anything is likely to come out that would be problematic for her, she'll see that it is leaked now--early on--to be hashed out for a few days and then re-buried as everything else is. IMO, it is no accident that Kerry is releasing more e-mails now. I'm pretty sure it is with her full knowledge and consent.
 


I would disagree with you AO He just got done ruffling her feathers and her flock. He wont accept her request to testify one time. So he postponed when he was going to call her. Cant do that until he has gone thru these emails.

He hasn't seen all the emails either. Which his committee was the one to discover missing emails and her hidden server. So I would say she was ruffled. She has been caught in several lies now. It can't keep continuing. The Demos know it and she does too.

Moreover BO's Teflon is stronger.....and he wont let anything get back to him.
 
US Conservative said:
Here she is today avoiding a reporter. Bet she's freaking out.
Click to expand...


Can she ponder that appearance?
Put it on her list?

She's terrible.
What a bad actress.
Her performances (like that one) before small select groups are transparently phony.
There's going to be a point when she's left with only the support from her diehards and that's not going to be enough.
 

Well maybe. But I've seen this go down the pike too many times already I guess. People have been trying to nail the Clintons on something ever since they first arrived in Washington. And even the one thing that stuck--the perjury and obstruction of justice charge--their supporters have been able to morph that into 'puritanical Republicans getting all excited about a blow job.' And it is that the more ignorant voters hear.
Think about all the Whitewater scandal, the insider trading scandal, the 'missing' Rose Law firm papers that just miraculously showed up on a coffee table in the White House, the Benghazi scandal, all the brouhaha over the e-mail accounts and missing e-mails, and the most questionable dealings of the Clinton Foundation--nothing has stuck. A Republican would have been crucified for any one of those things, but the Hillary supporters just shrug it off.

It may be that Mallory or somebody far left of Hillary will emerge as the front runner and she'll be denied the nomination yet again. But I'm sure not counting on it. They haven't cared before whether she was dishonest, incompetent, unqualified, or clueless. And no reason to think her supporters will care now.
 


Depends on whats happening in Iowa, eh? Then theres that NH appearance. So she will be close by, huh? :lol:
 



I think this time it will be hard to blame the Repubs.....so far its the Media bringing it to her. Plus the radio jocks have been going after the New Media personalities. Plus Team BO players.

She has driven Independents away from her......people are starting to take notice. Demos are worrying.....now with BO's CIA man out and saying her server would be breached by those Foreign Countries who are good at what they do. Leaves little doubt she caused a breach in National Security. More on that is going to come out too.

Especially since now all knows that the WH and BO was hacked thru State Dept Computers. From over a year ago. 2 years after the Romanian hacker got to her email then set up shop in her domain.
 

That's the list of people who will be thrown out of the press pool. After due consideration...... Okay. You're out.
 
humbolt said:
That's the list of people who will be thrown out of the press pool. After due consideration...... Okay. You're out.
Click to expand...

Wait'll Sid finds out who that was ... talk about watching your back.
 
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
gowdy. even remotely competent. laughable
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
 
justabubba said:
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
gowdy. even remotely competent. laughable
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Click to expand...

I have a LOT of debate experience and I would not expect to win going up against him on any topic. But against a post like what I've quoted here? Yeah, no problem.
 

The whole presentation is phony. She's quite wealthy, but tries to appear as one of the "common" folk. She uses phony "Americans" at these events. She wants to appear as if she is out and about to talk with people, yet she wont take questions. Its (bad) Kabuki theater.
 

I just read a piece in national journal discussing how Bill was similarly seen as generally untrustworthy, even before his reelection-but what Bill had going for him was he was seen as genuinely concerned about people. Hillary is also seen as generally untrustworthy, but she lacks that concern.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…