• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

St Louis flooding made more likely by global warming/climate change

Keep arguing when neither side is rock solid in proof of anything.
 
Annual deaths from worldwide climate and weather events are at an all time low. Crop yields are at an all time high with the earth greening at a significant rate due to increased CO2 fertilization . There is more reforestation than deforestation (though there is I concede a significant loss of habitat in more sensitive areas). The ice cap didnt disappear as Gore predicted it would by 2014 . The populations of the Maldives and Seychelles (slated to be underwater by now) have doubled with multi million dollar investment in beachfront holiday accommodation there .

For the last few millennia the Earth has been significantly warmer than it is today with both ourselves and the polar bears thriving. We are currently in an era of CO2 poverty if one actually checks the earths paleoclimatic record. The average level over the period life has existed being around 4 - 5 times what it is today. Indeed around 1700 CO2 levels came dangerously close to the kill level for plants at 180PPM (kill level is 150PPM) and were historic lows measured against the previous paleoclimatic norms

projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/climate/files/kobashietal2011.pdf

mclean.ch/climate/Ice_cores.html

In short we are currently economically destroying ourselves over something that represents a net benefit to us for the benefit of those who certainly don't have our best interests at heart :(

Our societies have gotten better in creating protections against extreme weather. While that trend is now being reverse because extreme weather are now becoming so much severe and frequent because of man made climate change.




There it also can be many economical and societal benefits of reducing the dependency of fossil fuels.



Including reducing the dependency and funding of ruthless dictators like for example Putin and the Saudis.
 
Keep arguing when neither side is rock solid in proof of anything.

The debate about climate change is over. That all the world leading scientific organizations are acknowledging the urgent need for action. Like for example these thirty one American.


That the evidence is so overwhelming that this report was published by federal agencies in 2018, then Republican controlled both the White House and Congress.

"The impacts of climate change are already being felt in communities across the country. More frequent and intense extreme weather and climate-related events, as well as changes in average climate conditions, are expected to continue to damage infrastructure, ecosystems, and social systems that provide essential benefits to communities. Future climate change is expected to further disrupt many areas of life, exacerbating existing challenges to prosperity posed by aging and deteriorating infrastructure, stressed ecosystems, and economic inequality. Impacts within and across regions will not be distributed equally. People who are already vulnerable, including lower-income and other marginalized communities, have lower capacity to prepare for and cope with extreme weather and climate-related events and are expected to experience greater impacts. Prioritizing adaptation actions for the most vulnerable populations would contribute to a more equitable future within and across communities. Global action to significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions can substantially reduce climate-related risks and increase opportunities for these populations in the longer term."

 
Including reducing the dependency and funding of ruthless dictators like for example Putin and the Saudis.
As if you really care about that :rolleyes:

After half a trillion Euros of investment over decades the Energiegewinde project in Germany has spectacularly failed and look at where they now find themselves, 80% dependent on just such a dictator
 
As if you really care about that :rolleyes:

After half a trillion Euros of investment over decades the Energiegewinde project in Germany has spectacularly failed and look at where they now find themselves, 80% dependent on just such a dictator

Germany now gets 50 percent of their electricity from renewable energy so Germany would have been a lot more dependent on Putin if it wasn't for the investment into renewable energy.


There that transition could have happen a lot faster if it wasn't for the influence of fossil fuel companies and ruthless dictators.



That there are now great opportunities to speed up the transition away from fossil fuels.


 
Back
Top Bottom