- Joined
- Aug 31, 2018
- Messages
- 56,066
- Reaction score
- 24,804
Ok, I give up. What is the question if reference to?Who hurt you?
Ok, I give up. What is the question if reference to?Who hurt you?
I do not want a direct conflict between the west and putin atm. I do agree with giving the Ukraine military arms until Russia is out of all of Ukraine
... the need for NATO will be greater than ever.
Hogwash.
What comes first, survival or morals?
Morals has its place but not at the top of the pole. Plus, as stated previous by another, morals are specific to culture. There is no universality to what they even are.
One of the reasons why the Russian army has done so poorly in Ukraine is because many individual Russian soldiers don’t believe in the righteousness of their cause. and with respect to Ukraine, part of the reason why they are doing well is because they know they are being attacked unjustly. Furthermore, Ukraine has received substantial support from the West, primarily because of people feel it’s immortal for Ukraine to be attacked by Russia. Morality is an important intangible and it’s foolish to dismiss it, especially in the face of such overwhelming evidence of its impact.
Oh, God. We gave support to Ukraine for strategic reasons, not moral reasons.
I get it. Humans don't want to see themselves for what they really are. That is really what all these responses are about to me. Nothing more.
I talk to coldly, objectively. People need to feel fuzzy and warm.
Peace
Thus far, that seems to be the strategy of the west. I suspect it will continue to be that way. I feel sorry for the people of both Ukraine and Russia that have to feel the effects of Putin's ego and ambitions.I am ok with arming them. The chess match requires no direct involvement however. We must respect the rules or the game could blow up.
You said it! You agree with me. We can't intervene everywhere. We have to set lines. We have. NATO IS the line. Especially as this is not in our sphere.
Well. I have been in that position and I did the right thing, as have millions upon millions before me.I doubt this would be your direction if confronted by serious injury or death directly. It's goes against human nature.
I figured it was evident in what you responded to the first time. Yes, we have to set lines. I waver one this one. I disagree that morality should never come into play. Those strategic reasons I agree with for supporting Ukraine apply. That's all.
I cannot say one way is better than the other, as long as the ways are doing what we are (and perhaps more) to provide material support, and a hot war with a Russia who could only respond with nukes or fold.
Well. I have been in that position and I did the right thing, as have millions upon millions before me.
What is the point of self preservation if you can't or won't do the right thing.
I'd rather not. It's illogical.
What are you talking about?Bull ****in shit,
I think morals is very high on the list.
I do not think it moves ahead of self preservation.
In fact, I know it doesn't no matter what people want to believe about themselves.
The leaders of the West and President Zelensky are bearing a heavy load on their shoulders.He really does seem to want the old USSR back in every way.
I continue to be torn between grudging acceptance of wise geopoitical strategy in the cold hard world we live in and the moral command to stop this all. It's a horrible choice.
If I were president and I order troops in on the moral mandate, I bet the lives of over 8,000,000,000 that the resulting conflict would not result in MAD realizing its potential. I might simultaneously lose all the allies I'd need to keep all the supply lines functioning. Russia's army is getting its ass kicked in Ukraine. It could not possibly withstand us. It would be one of those bets that's not all-in for us, but is either all-in or fold for the opponent. But it's not poker. All-in is nuclear war.
Yet, as I stay my hand, innocents are murdered, tortured, and forcibly relocated to Russia where they will be effectively conscripted into Putin's brand of Stalinization, ie:
Mariupol mayor says 31,000 residents deported at 'gunpoint' to Russian 'filtration camps,' evacuations stalled
https://news.yahoo.com/mariupol-mayor-says-31-000-124419266.html The mayor of the besieged city of Mariupol said that roughly 31,000 residents have been forcibly deported and sent to Russian "filtration camps" in occupied eastern Ukraine. Mayor Vadym Boychenko said in a Telegram post Friday...debatepolitics.com
(That is, if not in the army, they would have to at least act like they agree fully with the administration or face disappearance. Hell, he very well might simply kill them all and say they were allowed to go where they wanted and simply weren't heard from).
What to do?
What are you talking about?
You realize that most people do the right thing, even when there is high risk right?
The cowards are the minority.
Surely you understand that.
Putin will not lose. If we push him he will turn to Armageddon before defeat.It all comes down to the bet. Does fighting Russia provoke MAD, or not?
You didn't get the G.I. Joe with the kung fu grip for Christmas when you were a kid, did you.Bullshit. Complete bullshit.
It is rare someone places another before themselves. Even at the God damned ice cream stand.
If I remember correctly Putin also offered to pay the legal fees of anybody who assaults someone for not supporting the war.The idea of Russians turning on each other seems fun for a second or two, until you realize that the people they're turning on are moderates, and it ain't the moderates with institutional power. This means that as the Russian people become more militarily radicalized, we can expect ever greater horrors from that country. Russia is entering a period of darkness not seen since Stalin, and the need for NATO will be greater than ever.
"Russians who support the war against Ukraine are starting to turn on the enemy within, enabled by new laws that criminalize dissent. There are reports of students turning in teachers and people telling on neighbors and even diners at the next table.
Marina Dubrova, an English teacher on the Russian island of Sakhalin in the Pacific, showed an uplifting YouTube video to her eighth-grade class last month in which children, in Russian and Ukrainian, sing about a “world without war.”
After she played it, a group of girls stayed behind during recess and quizzed her on her views.
“Ukraine is a separate country, a separate one,” Ms. Dubrova, 57, told them.
“No longer,” one of the girls shot back.
A few days later, the police came to her school in the port town of Korsakov. In court, she heard a recording of that conversation, apparently made by one of the students. The judge handed down a $400 fine for “publicly discrediting” Russia’s Armed Forces. The school fired her, she said, for “amoral behavior.”
Spurred by Putin, Russians Turn on One Another Over the War (Published 2022)
Citizens are denouncing one another, illustrating how the war is feeding paranoia and polarization in Russian society.www.nytimes.com
That’s how Chamberlain thought. Then, the evil dictator took more and countries and began bombing London.I am not torn. The world is hell, always was, always will be.
Ukraine is not in Nato, Ukraine is not in our sphere of influence. This is black and white. Morals have no place for consideration here.
You didn't get the G.I. Joe with the kung fu grip for Christmas when you were a kid, did you.