White conservatives who want athletes to stay out of politics are letting their slips show.
What about Black conservatives .. like, maybe, Whitlock .. and many others who want no-nothing athletes to kindly refrain from stirring up the masses with conspiracy theory mass hysteria that gets them injured and arrested and put in prison for many years .. what about these
Black people?
Clearly you're letting
your slips show, as you've got an
obvious race-thing going here, like in your mind it's all Black liberals vs. White conservatives. :roll:
It's not about the athletes. It's not even about politics. It's ENTIRELY about WHOSE politics.
Wrong again, ultmd.
Whitlock made it
perfectly clear what it's about: James is being a bigot and inciting his followers to riot, which will destroy their neighborhoods, get them injured, get them arrested, and get them imprisoned. Whitlock isn't saying anything more than that.
The same conservative snowflakes who whine incessantly (and ignorantly) about their "rights" whenever "liberals" criticize a rightwingers words...are now suggesting that "athletes" shut up about politics. That's some serious "irony" (i.e. breath-taking hypocrisy) for you, there.
Uh, there's no such thing as a "conservative" snowflake, ultmd -- you're projecting again, as snowflakes are found only on the left.
So the only whining is done on the left .. and the rest of your post here is just more projection, not at all reflective of anyone or ideology but the left.
And, regarding hypocrisy, how about leftist Pelosi getting her hair done the other day at a closed salon while she supports the shutdown -- talk about "leftist hypocrite privilege"! :lol:
Anyone want to guess how the OP feels about athletes or celebrities who have publicly expressed conservative political views?
Well, your guess would be wrong.
I'm a centrist, not a conservative or a liberal, and I opposed on ethical principle athletes, entertainers, and celebrities speaking on politics and issues simply because a microphone was shoved in their face with an unethical question from an unethical reporter. It's patently unfair for them to get a megaphone to blurt out their political opinions when the rest of us, therapists, construction workers, computer programmers, dentists, food workers, etc. don't get an
equal form of voice.
If someone has earned their entry into the profession of politics, as an elected appointed servant, commentator, analyst, etc., then they are rightly more qualified to speak to the masses via the media and have their opinion considered.
Those like James who are simply not qualified to be addressing the masses politically are thereby, in their lack of qualification, most likely to do huge damage to the populous .. as James is clearly doing.