• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Spokesmen on the Right

It was all I could do to watch McLaughlin today. I like him. But Buchanon. He gets to hog all the time without being interrupted. Then, when the lefty lady tries to speak, he quickly walks all over her time and stuff. Typical, just like the old cross-fire with Kinsley.

"Lefty Lady" ? Are you referring to Eleanor Clift ? A true Democrat JFK/LBJ liberal.

Some years ago when radical left loons accused Pat Buchanan of being a racist she wet her panties laughing on live television. It was quite embarrassing. Those liberals who actually know Pat always come to his defense. Those libs who don't are probably something else hiding behind the liberal label.
 
didn't that asshole run in the primaries of both the Dem Party and the GOP

he's as much your spokesman as he is the GOPs
Maybe Duke's a Centrist :roll:
 
Pat was part of the earliest "religious right", Reagan and Rush. They made Goldwater want to puke. Pat is always everything anti-Israel, like his butt-buddy John Sunununu. And anti-everything Dems on whatever. He's in the top 10 for why America has come unglued since Repubs gained the Senate in 1982.
"Lefty Lady" ? Are you referring to Eleanor Clift ? A true Democrat JFK/LBJ liberal.

Some years ago when radical left loons accused Pat Buchanan of being a racist she wet her panties laughing on live television. It was quite embarrassing. Those liberals who actually know Pat always come to his defense. Those libs who don't are probably something else hiding behind the liberal label.
 
Ok, one reason, I can't take the right serious is the idiots they have speaking for them. In fact, it's guys like Ted Nugent and Chuck Norris that convince me that the arguments of the Right are well...wrong.

I see your Ted Nugent, Chuck Norris, et. al., and raise you Joe Biden, Barak Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, Jesse Jackson; and about half the population of Hollywood.
 
Last edited:
I call 'em as I see 'em. This was funny.
I see your Ted Nugent, Chuck Norris, et. al;, and raise you Joe Biden, Barak Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, Jesse Jackson; and about half the population of Hollywood.
 
is now the benchmark for today's Republican/Conservative/Libertarian-Righties

No he's not.

What's the old story about little puppies. When first born their eyes are closed and they are Democrats. When they get older they open their eyes and become Republicans.

The same is true with George Wallace. But when he opened his eyes and abandoned racisms he didn't join the Republican Party but the American Independent Party.


The racism found in the Democrat Party today can be traced back to the Progressive movement in America of the first half of the 20th Century. It was one of the leaders of the progressives, William Dillingham who was behind the Dillingham Commission, probably the most comprehensive study ever conducted by Congress.

41 volumes ! Even I haven't read it all but and it's an eye opener and extremely informative. Open Collections Program: Immigration to the US, Dillingham Commission (1907-1910)

Some years back on the old "Politico Forum" Cyrylek (same Cyrylek on the DP today) use to get in little arguments about William Dillingham, he claiming he was a racist. I asked for him to document it. How does one go through 41 volumes of a government study to find the source ? Not to many months ago I stumbled upon the evidence showing that Dillingham was a racist while browsing through the Dillingham Commision Report. Dillingham just like Theodore Roosevelt, Woodward Wilson (both progressives) and many other nationalist and internationalist socialist are racist.
 
I see your Ted Nugent, Chuck Norris, et. al., and raise you Joe Biden, Barak Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, Jesse Jackson; and about half the population of Hollywood.
Politics certainly is ugly. I can't think of too many human beings I dislike more than Pelosi and Feinstein.
 
Pat was part of the earliest "religious right", Reagan and Rush. They made Goldwater want to puke. Pat is always everything anti-Israel, like his butt-buddy John Sunununu. And anti-everything Dems on whatever. He's in the top 10 for why America has come unglued since Repubs gained the Senate in 1982.

I know Pat Buchanan better than most. We use to correspond back during the era of snail-mail.

On the American political spectrum I would put Pat, conservative-right. I put myself a few steps left of Pat.

Remember, Pat Buchanan just wasn't part of the Reagan administration but also the Nixon administration and was behind coming up with Nixon's "Southern Strategy."

>" In 1968, Nixon chose Spiro Agnew for vice president. Why? Agnew had routed George (“Your home is your castle!”) Mahoney for governor of Maryland but had also criticized civil-rights leaders who failed to condemn the riots that erupted after the assassination of King. The Agnew of 1968 was both pro-civil rights and pro-law and order.

When the ’68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.

Between 1969 and 1974, Nixon – who believed that blacks had gotten a raw deal in America and wanted to extend a helping hand:

* raised the civil rights enforcement budget 800 percent;

* doubled the budget for black colleges;

* appointed more blacks to federal posts and high positions
than any president, including LBJ;

* adopted the Philadelphia Plan mandating quotas for blacks
in unions, and for black scholars in colleges and
universities;

* invented “Black Capitalism” (the Office of Minority Business
Enterprise), raised U.S. purchases from black businesses
from $9 million to $153 million, increased small business
loans to minorities 1,000 percent, increased U.S. deposits
in minority-owned banks 4,000 percent;

* raised the share of Southern schools that were
desegregated from 10 percent to 70 percent. Wrote the
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in 1975, “It has only been
since 1968 that substantial reduction of racial segregation
has taken place in the South.”

The charge that we built our Republican coalition on race is a lie. Nixon routed the left because it had shown itself incompetent to win or end a war into which it had plunged the United States and too befuddled or cowardly to denounce the rioters burning our cities or the brats rampaging on our campuses.

Nixon led America out of a dismal decade and was rewarded with a 49-state landslide. By one estimate, he carried 18 percent of the black vote in 1972 and 25 percent in the South. No Republican has since matched that. To see Kristol colluding with the Times to rewrite that history to make liberals heroes and Republicans villains tells us more about him than about the era.

And where were the necons, when Goldwaterites and Nixonites were building the New Majority? Going all the way with LBJ."<

The Neocons and Nixon's Southern Strategy - Patrick J. Buchanan - Official Website
 
Back
Top Bottom