• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Special counsel Durham wants to bring up Trump-Russia dossier at trial against Clinton campaign lawyer

Athanasius68 said:
Trump didn't do anything.
Click to expand...

:LOL:

Gaslight yourselves. Trumpism - not the whole assholery punch-down ism package, but Trumpism specifically - might just be on the decline. There was nothing under the brash hatred and bravado. Just.... fake aggrievement. Those not perpetually aggrieved by fake culture wars have noticed.

You're selling yourselves shit in a box. That's all.
 
The closer this gets to the Clinton campaign the more hysterically animated some people become.
 
Mr Person said:
:LOL:

Gaslight yourselves. Trumpism - not the whole assholery punch-down ism package, but Trumpism specifically - might just be on the decline. There was nothing under the brash hatred and bravado. Just.... fake aggrievement. Those not perpetually aggrieved by fake culture wars have noticed.

You're selling yourselves shit in a box. That's all.
Click to expand...
If that's true you guys are buying it by the tanker truck.
 
Schism said:
The closer this gets to the Clinton campaign the more hysterically animated some people become.
Click to expand...
They are acting the same over the Hunter Biden investigation. It's really early in the week and there have been two whammies for them to digest involving both.
But I do see a difference between both investigations. In the Hunter Biden investigation and now Grand Jury, someone is leaking. In Durham's
investigation and Grand Jury there are no leaks. The only way we learn something is through his court filings.
 
vesper said:
In Durham's investigation and Grand Jury there are no leaks. The only way we learn something is through his court filings.
Click to expand...

The way an investigation should be run.
 
Mr Person said:
lol.

Nothing about Sussman is a "boom!"

Do any of you think OP even knows what it's about? It's nothing to do with their "fake!" claims. It's basically the dumbest fight on Earth about whether someone was still working for the Clinton campaign when they told the FBI they weren't, and I'm pretty sure I read that the time of the talk was after the election was over, etc., and it's based on a fair amount of guess work. That it's going to a trial means a judge thought there was probable cause. Big whoop.

Either way, even if he did everything Durham said, it's basically like trying to cast doubt on a murder investigation because one of the detectives lied about having spent an hour at the scene extra when he was really at a bar, where he happened to mention that he'd recently seen someone killed while they were smoking a cigarette. Nothing about Sussman casts doubt on the investigation.
Click to expand...
But there was 7 hrs of missing WH phone calls on the 6th, right? RIGHT?!?!??!?! ****ing funning that this is nothing but ya'll freak out over things that are completely made up.
 
the backstory to the steele dossier will go public in sworn proceedings

tRump is really going to enjoy this exposure

thank you mr durham
 
Today got me interested (especially the text from comment 9) - in the upcoming trial coming in mid-May.
 
Mycroft said:
"impeachment"???

This has nothing to do with impeachment. Don't worry, that corruption won't ever be addressed...except in the voting booth.
Click to expand...

In other words, there is nothing really there except smear campaign material and nothing of substance like "actual illegal activities". Did you feel the same way when Ivanka got her Chinese trademarks approved AFTER her father became president?
 
Mr Person said:
Durham's shit is the nothingburger of the century. Even if dickhead Sussman gets convicted, it casts no doubt on what did. It doesn't even cast doubt on IMPEACHMENT because he wasn't impeached for that.

He was impeached for ****ing Ukraine to extort fabrication of dirt on Hunter, and he was impeached for getting you people to try to destroy America. Do you know what the word "dismissed" means?



But of course you're gonna make noise about it. You haven't got anything else. Your ****-ass bastard called Putin's genocidal war "genius" and his second biggest cheerleader, Carlson, kept carrying water. Of course you're gonna make noise about anything.
Click to expand...
Dickhead Sussman was just working for Hillary Clinton, so, is he really guilty or is he only following his directive?
 
Davin said:
In other words, there is nothing really there except smear campaign material and nothing of substance like "actual illegal activities". Did you feel the same way when Ivanka got her Chinese trademarks approved AFTER her father became president?
Click to expand...
You haven't been reading this thread, have you?

There is a lot going on with the Durham investigation, but it won't touch the corruption withing the federal government.
 
Mycroft said:
The Trump/Russia nonsense has already been debunked. The guy Steel supposedly got his information from already debunked it. This Sussman/DNC/Clinton campaign stuff isn't about casting doubt on "what Trump actually did". It's about holding crooked people responsible for pushing the nonsense...for trying to get the FBI/DOJ involved in the nonsense.
Click to expand...
Here is some nonsense for you. The Election was Rigged. The Democrats Stole it From Me. There Was Election Fraud Everywhere. And all along he new he was lying. But you are worried about some low level lawyer who MAY have committed a low level crime.
 
The AntiDonald said:
Here is some nonsense for you. The Election was Rigged. The Democrats Stole it From Me. There Was Election Fraud Everywhere. And all along he new he was lying. But you are worried about some low level lawyer who MAY have committed a low level crime.
Click to expand...
And here you go...

DEFLECTION TIME!!!
You are dismissed.
 
What if...? said:
So you have two statements and the assumption that they’re lies.

Do you have some proof that he was actually working for the campaign and not just a concerned citizen?

Of course you don’t. Or you would have posted that instead.
Click to expand...
Yes, in the form of Sussmann's own testimony under oath before the House Intelligence Committee.

"Durham is also motioning to admit Sussmann’s congressional testimony from December 2017.

The interview was conducted under oath by then-chief congressional investigator for the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation, Kash Patel.

In the line of questioning Durham is requesting be admitted as evidence for trial, Patel asks Sussmann if he engaged with the FBI and the CIA on his "own volition," to which Sussmann replied: "No."


Patel then asks Sussmann if his client directed him to have conversations with the FBI and CIA, to which Sussmann replied: "Yes."

Patel asked if Sussmann’s clients knew he was going to the CIA to disclose additional information in February 2017, to which he replied: "Yes."

Sussmann also testified that he had "a conversation" with his client, "as lawyers do with their clients, about client needs and objectives and the best course to take for a client."
 
Mr Person said:
How'd that pre-emptive victory lap work out for you? Time to start some threads about laptops, perhaps?
Click to expand...
Every time something like this happens, it just proves that everything republicans accuse democrats of, they are guilty of themselves.
 
Hillary and her staff are too big to jail. Half the jurors gave money to the Hillary Clinton campaign. The judge's wedding was presided over by Merritt Garland. Sussmann's daughter goes to school with the judge's daughter.

Justice was done.
 
The most important part of this case was heard by the American people: Hillary Clinton's campaign fabricated the entire Trump-Russia-Collusion Hoax. Democrats knew about it and still used it as a pretext to obstruct Trump's presidency and launch investigation after investigation. Sussmann got away with one.
 
Schism said:
The most important part of this case was heard by the American people: Hillary Clinton's campaign fabricated the entire Trump-Russia-Collusion Hoax. Democrats knew about it and still used it as a pretext to obstruct Trump's presidency and launch investigation after investigation. Sussmann got away with one.
Click to expand...
womp womp womp waaaaaaa
 
justoneman said:
Hillary and her staff are too big to jail. Half the jurors gave money to the Hillary Clinton campaign. The judge's wedding was presided over by Merritt Garland. Sussmann's daughter goes to school with the judge's daughter.

Justice was done.
Click to expand...
You're just not thinking through what you're posting. If half the jurors were in the Clinton camp, that means that most of the other half were in the Trump camp.

The outcome would have been the same. A hung jury, with little to no chance Durham would have attempted to re-try it. He would have lost a second time.

So much losing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom