- Joined
- Oct 31, 2010
- Messages
- 18,536
- Reaction score
- 2,438
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
What do you know of it? First is the baptism of water, then the repentance of sin and the infilling of the Holy Ghost.
In the book of Acts, the apostles were filled with the Holy Ghost and spoke in Tongues over 2,000 years ago. They do so today, and are ridiculed just as those in the past.
People say they lie or act; that it is all a facade. My parents have it, as well as some of my friends. I suppose they are facadal? That the hundreds of thousands of them are facadal?
Why have I heard discussions of people from foreign nations that can hear segments of their language in those who Speak in Tongues?
Here is a link I found on a liberal-biased news show that discussed the issue: YouTube - Speaking in Tongues Medical Study proves Holy Spirit praying I tell you this news show is not biased for those who Speak in Tongues.
Will you say they are "drunk", as was said 2,000 years ago?
I want an honest and mature discussion on this issue. What do you think of this?
In the book of Acts, the apostles were filled with the Holy Ghost and spoke in Tongues over 2,000 years ago. They do so today, and are ridiculed just as those in the past.
People say they lie or act; that it is all a facade. My parents have it, as well as some of my friends. I suppose they are facadal? That the hundreds of thousands of them are facadal?
Why have I heard discussions of people from foreign nations that can hear segments of their language in those who Speak in Tongues?
Here is a link I found on a liberal-biased news show that discussed the issue: YouTube - Speaking in Tongues Medical Study proves Holy Spirit praying I tell you this news show is not biased for those who Speak in Tongues.
Will you say they are "drunk", as was said 2,000 years ago?
I want an honest and mature discussion on this issue. What do you think of this?
Last edited: