No, it wasnt a question...it refuted your attempt at an answer.
As you still cannot refute it, my argument remains as truth.
How about their being a horrible example.for our young people? How about we would eventually die out if everyone decide to be Gay? How about God detroying us for allowing it to be normalised?
:lamo
Do tell us about Jesus' rants against homosexuality.
Now what are you babbling about?
Because it is not possible ontologically to terminate such a marriage.
OMG, how irrelevant!
Ontological argument:
: an argument for the existence of God based upon the meaning of the term God
Palecon continues to attempt to get Americal to create (or maintain) law based on a belief in God.
There was nothing for me to refute. Only your assertions.
Here, let me post it for you for clarity, altho I dont know why you've forgotten it so quicky.
Where was I babbling again?
I was talking about the nature of divorce, then you started going on about arguments for the existence of God.
Because it is not possible ontologically to terminate such a marriage.
You are mistaken again. You opened that door in the discussion on divorce:
Care to deny anything else?
I did not refer to the existence of God. If you don't know what "ontological" means then that's your problem.
Heteros are by nature non-fornicating but, I do indeed dislike adulterers.
Simply by their unnatural existence. They are like a blight on the citrus crop....a stye on your eye....the nasty last sip of a cheap beer.
It is reality, that I happen to acknowledge.
How about their being a horrible example.for our young people?
How about we would eventually die out if everyone decide to be Gay?
How about God detroying us for allowing it to be normalised?
Why those sneaky bastards.
The refused to hear cases on appeal from the 10th, 7th, and 4th Circuit courts where in each of the 7 cases (7 cases, from 5 states, heard by the 3 Circuits) where in each case the of Appeals decision was that the State bans were unconstitutional so that the SCOTUS's own stay was lifted (and thereby the stays from the Circuits) which allows same-sex Civil Marriage to start in those 5 States and as many as 11 States once the Cicruit courts apply their ruling to the other 6 states.
Thousands, probably 10's of thousands of legal same-sex Civil Marriages will occur - marriages that won't be revoked because they were legal at the time. (It would take an ex post facto law to invalidate them, which is itself unconstitutional.)
Just so in the future they can take some other case and rule that from that point forward that States can enact laws that discriminate against homosexuals.
Diabolical I say...
............... Diabolical.
>>>>
He is indeed that loving and forgiving and takes the entire breadth of our lives into consideration, not one thing. A gay family, raising their kids in a healthy, happy environment? God would NEVER judge them harshly. If you believe that, you are living in the Old Testament in order to gratify yourself and your own judgements...which is against God's Law.
What percentage of SSMz actually involve children (counting the ones whose lives are ruined bscause of it) ?
whys it matter how many have kids?
and how dose it ruin children's lives?
The left is much more unlikely to stigmatize kids of gay children than those who feel gay marriage is wrong.Stigmatization.
The Leftist mind washings have also driven a wedge between children and normal parents.
Stigmatization.
The Leftist mind washings have also driven a wedge between children and normal parents.
and homosexuality is hurting people how gay marriage is hurting people how?
It hurts him having to put up with the groupthink from your side of the room. It hurts him to express his beliefs only to be sued over it. Why do the thought police on the left think they are the only ones who can have a belief or an opinion?
It hurts him having to put up with the groupthink from your side of the room. It hurts him to express his beliefs only to be sued over it. It hurts the rest of us to have the thought police on the left constantly trying to shove their beliefs down everyone else's throats. Sound familiar?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?