- May 1, 2013
- Reaction score
- Outside Seattle
- Political Leaning
You claim you don't expect the reader to take your word for it then offer unsupported declarations that exclusive "interpretations" of the 14th Amendment exclude the unborn while ignoring the obvious implications for illegal aliens. Your word declares the enumerated Constitutional right to life in the 5th Amendment does not apply. Your word declares rights explicitly documented in the Constitution must be "recognized" or they aren't applicable, contradicting the meaning of rights on your edict. Your refuse to recognize that the Federal statute you quote has a section that nullifies your argument.
I note the absence of any attempt to refute the unalienable right to life specified by the DOI. We supposed to just take your silence as proof?
I did support it...that and the fact that there are no federal laws or federal court decisions that recognize rights for the unborn. Now, where are your sources that prove me wrong? This is what, the 5th time I've asked?
And the DOI isnt a legal document. But if it was, and all 'men' are created equal, then why did we have to pass amendments and precedents to ensure equal rights for blacks and women? And now...where is that for the unborn. Again...source it.