• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Some REpubs might ask for "deeper" investigation of Sandy Berger

Stu Ghatze

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
531
Reaction score
0
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Gotta feeling this might just be the beginings of things to come since it appears the senate democrats want to follow the Iraq war, & the CIA leak case as reasons to destroy Bush.

Most remember Sandy Berger right? THat good little democratic aid to Bill Clinton that recieved so many nice kudos for being a committed public servant, ..who also illegally stole NSA documents, lied about it...& then pleaded guilty, ..IF one could actually find the story where it was buried in the back of the New York times?

Funny thing about Sandy, ..outside from stuffing the NSA documents down his pants etc, & spiriting them out of the NSA archive building; well....Sandy doesn't remember what he did with the REST of them; but at least he put back the ones he chose to put back!:2razz:

Much of it has to do with Bill Clinton's response to terror attacks in America etc, & some of it might probably even define the facts about MOhammed Atta's terror cell that was in America a full year before 9/11 occurred.

Ahh shucks, ..Sandy payed his fine after he pleaded guilty ..but also after he knowingly LIED about stealing them??

He got his slap on the wrist,..so the democrats should not feel too bad, ..like he was "railroaded" or something!;)

Of course the media did not saturate everybody for days, or weeks, or even have a 2-year investigation at the insistence of leading democrats because "they" just wanted the truth to come out, & all that sort of rot, ..nor did THEY seem to care about any laws that might have been broken, or any concerns about American security, ..'cause afteral...Sandy Berger is a swell guy, & a tireless public servant.

It might be very interesting, & perhaps even moreso IF the republicans have solid evidence that Clinton preferred IGNORING terror cells in America, ..as no doubt the evidence that Sandy Berger most probably helped to make "disappear", (..or perhaps the Rose Law firm records that Hillary confisgated, or were they the "Travelgate" records she made off with?)

Silly me, ..those last 2- items had nothing to do with America's security, ..just the security, & comfort of the Clinton's!:2razz:
 

aps

Passionate
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 25, 2005
Messages
15,675
Reaction score
2,979
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
Stu Ghatze said:
Gotta feeling this might just be the beginings of things to come since it appears the senate democrats want to follow the Iraq war, & the CIA leak case as reasons to destroy Bush.

Most remember Sandy Berger right? THat good little democratic aid to Bill Clinton that recieved so many nice kudos for being a committed public servant, ..who also illegally stole NSA documents, lied about it...& then pleaded guilty, ..IF one could actually find the story where it was buried in the back of the New York times?

Funny thing about Sandy, ..outside from stuffing the NSA documents down his pants etc, & spiriting them out of the NSA archive building; well....Sandy doesn't remember what he did with the REST of them; but at least he put back the ones he chose to put back!:2razz:

Much of it has to do with Bill Clinton's response to terror attacks in America etc, & some of it might probably even define the facts about MOhammed Atta's terror cell that was in America a full year before 9/11 occurred.

Ahh shucks, ..Sandy payed his fine after he pleaded guilty ..but also after he knowingly LIED about stealing them??

He got his slap on the wrist,..so the democrats should not feel too bad, ..like he was "railroaded" or something!;)

Of course the media did not saturate everybody for days, or weeks, or even have a 2-year investigation at the insistence of leading democrats because "they" just wanted the truth to come out, & all that sort of rot, ..nor did THEY seem to care about any laws that might have been broken, or any concerns about American security, ..'cause afteral...Sandy Berger is a swell guy, & a tireless public servant.

It might be very interesting, & perhaps even moreso IF the republicans have solid evidence that Clinton preferred IGNORING terror cells in America, ..as no doubt the evidence that Sandy Berger most probably helped to make "disappear", (..or perhaps the Rose Law firm records that Hillary confisgated, or were they the "Travelgate" records she made off with?)

Silly me, ..those last 2- items had nothing to do with America's security, ..just the security, & comfort of the Clinton's!:2razz:
I would welcome that investigation. But you know what, Stu? It would truly make the republicans look so pathetic. That is one of the reasons I would support the investigation. It would be the republicans saying, "Nah nah nah nah nah." Real mature. :roll:
 
Top Bottom