Same with the name for tree.
False equalization is bad form.
Same with the name for tree.
Same with the name for tree.
False equalization is bad form.
You're utterly confused. The socialist ideology didn't exist before it, well, you know, existed. Many of the ideas behind it however existed well before that point. Do you understand the difference?
A lot of Venezuela's problems stem from their government's offensively poor management of money. Chavez rode high oil prices to the top without any thought on the future and without re-investing. If the cash cow is providing for you, it would be wise to ensure the cow receives the best care (meaning there was poor investment back in to the country's oil future). Instead of pumping money back in to other exports (i.e. agriculture, technology, etc.), the government essentially wasted the money. Venezuela was essentially relying on one export to hoist the entire country and, when that failed, you see what happened. I don't know if this is a lesson in socialism per se or rather, investment.
He's just trying to claim that everyone is a socialist. The problem of course is that he's wrong and using examples that existed before socialist ideology.
You're utterly confused. The socialist ideology didn't exist before it, well, you know, existed. Many of the ideas behind it however existed well before that point. Do you understand the difference?
Very far left propaganda insists that everything good is socialism and everything bad is capitalism. WHich apparently works for those people that swim in the koolaid punch bowl.
False equalization is bad form.
I am a landlord, so I can't be that far left.
Does that mean valid equalization is good form?
Yet you are here spreading that same tired old propaganda.
Very far left propaganda insists that everything good is socialism and everything bad is capitalism. WHich apparently works for those people that swim in the koolaid punch bowl.
Sorry spellcheck strikes again! False Equivalence | Truly Fallacious
Describing a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none.
A definitive definition for socialism does not exist. It depends on the definer. In all discussions on socialism, it would help if the writer frst started with his or her definition. Then these threads wouldn't spend 3/4 of the time where one person calls the other person an idiot for not knowing what socialism is.
What was a tree called before the word tree was created?
Who knows, but the tree existed nonetheless.
I am a landlord, so I can't be that far left.
Facepalm. Ideologies have starting points and founders. They are not things that has simply always existed but under different names.
My question to you is do you think the opposite is true? Name me some BAD things about capitalism.
According to your logic being a landlord could possibly have been a socialist idea. :lol:
So capitalism didn't exist until someone coined the term?
Facepalm for sure.
Google the history of capitalism and tell me.
It looks like you are as well. The difference is I don't criticize you for spreading the same old propaganda since doing so would make me a hypocrite, and I'm even less a fan of being a hypocrite than I am of hypocrites in general.
How can you stand being a hypocrite?
Lol I am not spreading any propaganda. Nice try though.