see the example of other nations that have worked with National Socialism. oh, and the bit below
Mussolini was a Fascist, not a National Socialist.
:lamo
Unity is perfectly achievable with the "other" of poverty, disease, starvation etc etc.
completely incorrect. unity isn't even perfectly achievable with an actual human enemy; and the use of non-corporeal 'others' such as poverty or disease is a
vastly inferior 'other' as far as 'unification' efforts are concerned.
go poll Americans to find out how many think the government should stop fighting the war on terror.
go poll Americans to find out how many think the government should stop fighting the war on drugs.
What on earth does Francis Galton have to do with this?
Galton was only one of the early pioneers of the eugenics movement; which was huge (and now conveniently largely forgotten); and there is a
strong historical connection between Eugenics and Socialism.
That's Socialism, son
on the contrary. socialism, by definition, is utilizing the coercive power of the state to
force people to work together in certain, centrally determined manners. that is rather the opposite of freedom.
Against force? We're plenty for the use of force against marginal elements of our society, see the Civil Rights movement, Native Americans, Kent State, etc etc.
interesting use of examples; you support the use of force against the individuals involved in those instances?
Not true at all. Look at many European countries and systems such as Social Security and Medicare in this country, public health in Canada, etc etc.
Europe is sending herself into spasms' right now trying to
divest itself of it's socialism, Canada's Supreme Court recently struck down key provisions of its' healthcare system because
too many people were dying on waiting lists, and Social Security / Medicare seem doomed to send American into bankruptcy. you may way want to pick different examples