- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
- Messages
- 28,822
- Reaction score
- 20,495
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
There's no option for widowed or other, so I answered single, which is technically correct.
There's no option for widowed or other, so I answered single, which is technically correct.
There's no option for widowed or other, so I answered single, which is technically correct.
I just opted to spell it out.
My apologies to the both of you.
I thought about it after the fact, but it was too late to edit.
I had a first date that was to see Princess Mononoke, her pick. Back at her apartment, she had anime, comic book, and sci-fi paraphernalia decorating her small apartment. And she was hot. She was a bit young for me maturity-wise, and demanding, but they are out thereI am an anime nerd. That should safely answer your question.
My apologies to the both of you.
I thought about it after the fact, but it was too late to edit.
Another item you missed was "Insignificant Other." :lamo
I have been with someone for the last 5 years or so.
You forgot the all time favorite, "It's complicated'...... :lol:
Happily married for almost 21 years.
Do they count as significant others if you don't love them, but just **** them sometimes?
It seems rude to label them as insignificant.l dont think so
It seems rude to label them as insignificant.
It goes to the assumption of love as being the only possible yardstick of worth. A union's merit may be gauged in terms other then the spiritual. There was no disrespect.it depends on what you feel about them maybe .men may think differently
your question was rude too :mrgreen:
Close encounter?I'm taken.
It goes to the assumption of love as being the only possible yardstick of worth. A union's merit may be gauged in terms other then the spiritual. There was no disrespect.
Can't help it. :3oops:men..
Can't help it. :3oops: