• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

So about Nevada...

gavinfielder

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
756
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
This is the most replete article I've found on the issue:

‘Bernie Or Bust’: Bernie Sanders’ Supporters More Determined Than Ever After Chaos At The Nevada Democratic Convention

The “Bernie or Bust” movement has grown now that Bernie Sanders’ supporters are outraged over the chaos at the Nevada Democratic Convention on Saturday. Despite having less support during the convention, Hillary Clinton was awarded more delegates. The decision caused Bernie supporters to become outraged as they believe the Nevada voters are victims of election suppression.

It turns out that Bernie Sanders actually had more support at the convention than Hillary Clinton. However, the convention did not count 58 delegates for Sanders because they said they did not switch their party affiliation to Democrat in time for the convention. The delegates had until May 1 to become Democrats, but at the Nevada Democratic Convention, 58 out of the 64 contested delegates for Sanders could not be found as registered and were stricken from the count. Due to that issue, Hillary Clinton was able to take Nevada by 33 votes.

...

Sanders’ supporters are angry because they claim the convention rules were changed literally at the convention in order to purposefully deny certain delegates from voting in order to ensure that Clinton took the majority of delegates. Then, when the underdogs demanded a recount of the delegates because they believed they were being cheated, that request was denied as well.

Denying delegate status for not registering as Democrat by May 1st is plausible, but that this was the case for 91% of Sanders delegates is definitely not.
 

gavinfielder

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
756
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
Saturday’s Nevada Democratic Convention is now marred in controversy as reports from independent sources surfaced of delegate tampering and rule changes that ignored support for U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and took away delegates he earned at county conventions in March.

The 16-hour convention began with a temporary rule change that was “passed” despite not receiving a clear majority of vocal votes, according to a report from Heavy:

Sanders supporters had been worried about these rules for weeks and had collected delegate signatures to seek changes to the rules. According to Jordan Chariton of The Young Turks, this rule change involved going with the delegate count from the first tier vote and ignoring the delegate count from the second tier, which Sanders had won.
Corroborating Evidence Shows Clinton Camp Tampering with Delegate Count in Nevada

Apparently the rule change that's been mentioned didn't affect the registration problem. The rule change was a vote to disregard the second tier caucus results entirely, and the vote was taken 30 minutes before the event was supposed to begin.

So bam, everyone who went to the last caucus just got their vote thrown out before everyone was present.



See, I'd like to think that among Hillary supporters, there are more people who actually respect the right to vote than those who are just dishonest filth, but apparently her supporters (at least those at the convention) are just as dishonest as she is.
 

Fishking

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Messages
28,481
Reaction score
9,422
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Can't blame this one on Trump, eh?
 

Skeptic Bob

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
16,626
Reaction score
19,488
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
I wish I could say I was surprised by such tactics.
 

sKiTzo

DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,573
Reaction score
495
Location
OC California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
This is the most replete article I've found on the issue:

‘Bernie Or Bust’: Bernie Sanders’ Supporters More Determined Than Ever After Chaos At The Nevada Democratic Convention



Denying delegate status for not registering as Democrat by May 1st is plausible, but that this was the case for 91% of Sanders delegates is definitely not.

We're seeing the exact same thing that we saw with Ron Paul and the tepubs. Hillary has no support from THE PEOPLE, period. So what do dem leaders do? CHEAT. It's despicable. Anyone who has been a financial supporter of the party should pull that support for good after such a display.
 

sKiTzo

DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,573
Reaction score
495
Location
OC California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
Corroborating Evidence Shows Clinton Camp Tampering with Delegate Count in Nevada

Apparently the rule change that's been mentioned didn't affect the registration problem. The rule change was a vote to disregard the second tier caucus results entirely, and the vote was taken 30 minutes before the event was supposed to begin.

So bam, everyone who went to the last caucus just got their vote thrown out before everyone was present.



See, I'd like to think that among Hillary supporters, there are more people who actually respect the right to vote than those who are just dishonest filth, but apparently her supporters (at least those at the convention) are just as dishonest as she is.

She has no supporters. Nobody wants a criminal like her. The people at the conventions supporting her are most likely being paid to do so - put that together with the dem leadership cheating and committing acts of fraud and then add the so-called media touting her as a "frontrunner" and you have a deception that Americans swallow hook, line, and sinker. How fkn ridiculous. Why can't people be not so easily duped?
 

gavinfielder

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
756
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
She has no supporters. Nobody wants a criminal like her. The people at the conventions supporting her are most likely being paid to do so - put that together with the dem leadership cheating and committing acts of fraud and then add the so-called media touting her as a "frontrunner" and you have a deception that Americans swallow hook, line, and sinker. How fkn ridiculous. Why can't people be not so easily duped?
I see no ulterior reason for Barbara Boxer to support her, given that she's retiring.
 

sKiTzo

DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,573
Reaction score
495
Location
OC California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
I see no ulterior reason for Barbara Boxer to support her, given that she's retiring.

MONEY. Wall street is cutting fat lump sums to anybody who will support Hillary. That's what they do. They BUY people. Money is nothing to them.
 

Fletch

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
40,507
Reaction score
18,068
Location
Mentor Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
She has no supporters. Nobody wants a criminal like her. The people at the conventions supporting her are most likely being paid to do so - put that together with the dem leadership cheating and committing acts of fraud and then add the so-called media touting her as a "frontrunner" and you have a deception that Americans swallow hook, line, and sinker. How fkn ridiculous. Why can't people be not so easily duped?

Well,, someone must support her. After all she has a couple million more votes than Sanders.
 

sKiTzo

DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,573
Reaction score
495
Location
OC California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
Well,, someone must support her. After all she has a couple million more votes than Sanders.

The ones who count the votes support her. They are the same ones who don't count votes that they don't want to count.
 

sKiTzo

DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,573
Reaction score
495
Location
OC California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
Well,, someone must support her. After all she has a couple million more votes than Sanders.

Just look at rally attendance and do the math. Then ask yourself where this couple million is coming from.
 

sKiTzo

DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,573
Reaction score
495
Location
OC California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
Just look at rally attendance and do the math. Then ask yourself where this couple million is coming from.
If Americans don't wake up fast to the fact that they are being (and have been for some time now) PUNKED on a very grand scale, tyranny is just around the corner for them. It's time to declare WAR on the media.
 
Top Bottom