I don't know of anyone who claims the right “to tell ALL the women in the US when they can have a baby, how many babies they should have and by whom these babies will be fathered”.
What you are writing about, of course, is the assertion that a woman who already has a baby should have the right to have that baby killed, up to a certain arbitrary point, if that baby's existence becomes inconvenient to her.
I find it very odd that this is widely seen as a religious issue, and that it is only religious organizations which take up the cause of defending unborn children. Outside of this one issue, I think nearly everyone agrees that the single most vital and essential of all human rights is the right not to be intentionally killed, unless there are very drastic and extreme circumstances to justify that killing.
I see no rational reason at all why abortion should be treated as any kind of exception to the constraints that any civilized society otherwise places on homicide in general. A human being is a human being, no matter the size, age, or stage of development, and all human beings are certainly entitled to the same basic right to exist.
