• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Smoking Illegal With Children In Car[W:501]

Do you agree with ban on smoking inside cars with children?


  • Total voters
    84
Please detail exactly what "control" you've "lost" regarding this ban?

You do realize that every ban takes away control from the people and puts that control in the hands of the state, right?
 

Yup, they don't want to be thrown in jail or have their property stolen. That is kind of why coercion works. Duh.
 
If I rolled my eyes as much as that statement required they'd pop out of my sockets.

Ask them to explain the orange/yellow crap that's all over the inside of car. :roll: That is getting into baby's lungs!
 
Ask them to explain the orange/yellow crap that's all over the inside of car. :roll: That is getting into baby's lungs!

No no no, you see, the venturi effect gets rid of that.
 

Obamacare will make everything the govt want to make illegal, illegal. They will control everything that happens in your home under the guise of healthcare.
 
Obamacare will make everything the govt want to make illegal, illegal. They will control everything that happens in your home under the guise of healthcare.

Yes, they should totally make a sequel to Braveheart based on this new law.
 
The cutoff age should be when the person has reached an age where they are no longer obligated (ethically, socially, by force of law) to obey their parents, whatever that age is in their state.

Then they cannot be compelled to be in the car with the smoking parent, and if they choose to be in the car with the smoking parent, it's on them.

For a similar reason, a similar "in the presence of" law should also apply to adult use of alcohol and drugs.
 
Obamacare will make everything the govt want to make illegal, illegal. They will control everything that happens in your home under the guise of healthcare.

Yes, I know. One of the primary reasons for my position of opposition to it. Far too much government control and potential abuse of power.
 
So you are stating that wind blowing by a slightly open window does not create a vacuum?

I'm stating that you pulled the first science-y sounding phrase you found off the internet and thought it would sound persuasive (spoiler alert: it wasn't very persuasive).
 
I'm stating that you pulled the first science-y sounding phrase you found off the internet and thought it would sound persuasive (spoiler alert: it wasn't very persuasive).

How do you know that I am not science-y, and in fact did not turn to the web.

Hmm?
 
Does the argument behind this work in the home?
 
I'm not saying you should be able to smoke anywhere and everywhere, but a car is private property. That's only a step away from saying you can't smoke in your house.

Not legal to smoke in your own home has already been accomplished in parts of California.

Slippery slope meets black abyss.
 
Only a mobile home.

While it's mobile, of course.

No, I mean the argument that states the child has no choice to be around the smoke. Wouldn't that argument work just about anywhere?
 
How do you know that I am not science-y, and in fact did not turn to the web.

Hmm?

Because everyone here over the age of 16 has cracked a window (or has been a passenger where someone has cracked a window) and it doesn't work.
 
Not legal to smoke in your own home has already been accomplished in parts of California.

Slippery slope meets black abyss.

If I recall it's because the smoke will travel throughout the house and the kid has no choice but to be in the home. That is essentially the same argument being made here. The smoke is traveling around the car and the kid has no choice but to be in the car. There is no doubt it is the same argument.
 
Because everyone here over the age of 16 has cracked a window (or has been a passenger where someone has cracked a window) and it doesn't work.

I know we never cracked our windows in LA in the '60s. The smog would burn you to temporary blindness. Perhaps that is your problem.
 
.would someone... Please... Think of the children!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
.would someone... Please... Think of the children!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The ironic thing is I don't even have kids (and never will).
 
Because I know people and the point of laws, particularly laws such as this. The point is deterrence.

Except you don't know there will be less, you hope there will be.
 
I know we never cracked our windows in LA in the '60s. The smog would burn you to temporary blindness. Perhaps that is your problem.

But wouldn't the venturi effect just get rid of all the smog too? I mean, just look at these equations...

 
Except you don't know there will be less, you hope there will be.

Congratulations, you just argued against the existence of laws.
 
Are there really people who would defend their right to smoke in a small closed environment with children? I cant beleive someone would really want to do it to start with, but defend it?
 
Are there really people who would defend their right to smoke in a small closed environment with children? I cant beleive someone would really want to do it to start with, but defend it?

Minivans and SUVs aren't exactly confined spaces. Put the kids in the back of the Excursion and smoke way up there in the front.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…