The Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History in July removed
references to President Donald Trump’s two impeachments from an exhibit
display. A person familiar with the exhibit plans, who was not authorized to
discuss them publicly, said the change came about as part of a content review
that the Smithsonian agreed to undertake following pressure from the White
House to remove an art museum director.
A temporary label including content about Trump’s impeachments had been on
display since September 2021 at the Washington museum, a Smithsonian
spokesperson told The Washington Post, adding that it was intended to be a
short-term addition to address current events. Now, the exhibit notes that
“only three presidents have seriously faced removal.”
You seem upset.What the king wants, the king gets.
Smithsonian erasing history, removes Trump from display of impeached presidents.
(sorry no nonpaywalled version yet)
How do you figure?You seem upset.
from the wapo article:What the king wants, the king gets.
Smithsonian erasing history, removes Trump from display of impeached presidents.
(sorry no nonpaywalled version yet)
Oh….then I guess it’s all good. Perfect.How do you figure?
What do you think of the Smithsonian's altering historical record by removing trump from the grouping of impeached Presidents?Oh….then I guess it’s all good. Perfect.
What the king wants, the king gets.
Smithsonian erasing history, removes Trump from display of impeached presidents.
(sorry no nonpaywalled version yet)
Someone sounds sad and triggered.
Huh?I guess you'll have to find your temporary labels somewhere else since Trump is the current President.
????Someone sounds sad and triggered.
I guess you'll have to find your temporary labels somewhere else since Trump is the current President.
Why was he impeached? This is fun.What do you think of the Smithsonian's altering historical record by removing trump from the grouping of impeached Presidents?
????
Not at all. But, since you're responded to the thread, I'll ask you the question pertinent to the topic:
What do you think of the Smithsonian's altering historical record by removing trump from the grouping of impeached Presidents?
The whitewashing of history. It’s what dictators do. Next, they’ll be telling us that 1/6 insurrectionists are patriots. Oh wait.What the king wants, the king gets.
Smithsonian erasing history, removes Trump from display of impeached presidents.
(sorry no nonpaywalled version yet)
How do you figure?
Huh?
A temporary label including content about Trump’s impeachments had been on
display since September 2021 at the Washington museum, a Smithsonian
spokesperson told The Washington Post, adding that it was intended to be a
short-term addition to address current events. Now, the exhibit notes that
“only three presidents have seriously faced removal.”
You don't answer a question by asking a different question. Because you refuse to answer the question that is directly pertinent to the topic - the one I posed to you in Post #6 - you are coming perilously close to disclosing your lack of good faith.Why was he impeached? This is fun.
Trump is currently being impeached?It's not historical if it is currently happening.
Writing the history of the Trump presidency is bad form. It's still his presidency. I can see how they pressed to write it thinking he was done after the first term but that simple isn't the truth.
What you've quoted doesn't indicate the poster is "triggered".Did you read the OP?
Maybe you should read your link.
Yeah, I know about the supposed temporary thing, but it was a dumb statement hence "huh".Did you read the OP?
Maybe you should read your link.
For making a $400 million-dollar military aid package that was approved by Congress contingent upon its recipient making up false allegations against Donald Trump's opponent in his reelection campaign.Why was he impeached? This is fun.
I can say whatever I want. If you struggle with that, I don’t care. My lack of “faith”? I have been a good citizen for 63 years. I can assure you I am not looking for your approval. Please do carry on….You don't answer a question by asking a different question. Because you refuse to answer the question that is directly pertinent to the topic - the one I posed to you in Post #6 - you are coming perilously close to disclosing your lack of good faith.
So, here's another opportunity for you to play the good citizen:
What do you think of the Smithsonian's altering historical record by removing trump from the grouping of impeached Presidents?
Trump is currently being impeached?
He was actually impeached in his first term. Twice.It's not historical if it is currently happening.
Writing the history of the Trump presidency is bad form. It's still his presidency. I can see how they pressed to write it thinking he was done after the first term but that simple isn't the truth.
I "struggle" with nothing where you are concerned. Posting in bad faith is evidenced by a continuing refusal to answer a question that is directly pertinent to the topic of the thread.I can say whatever I want. If you struggle with that, I don’t care. My lack of “faith”? I have been a good citizen for 63 years. I can assure you I am not looking for your approval. Please do carry on….
What you've quoted doesn't indicate the poster is "triggered".
Back to the question I've asked you:
What do you think of the Smithsonian's altering historical record by removing trump from the grouping of impeached Presidents?
Now, the exhibit notes that
“only three presidents have seriously faced removal.”
Stick to what I say. I did not say the Smithsonian has "lied".The OP indicated that the exhibit notes the following....
What about that is a lie?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?