- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
- Messages
- 23,835
- Reaction score
- 16,139
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
-- But alright, I'll have a crack at civility again...
Thank you.
-- Mulberry bush time
-- "Also the statement that "we are a nation of immigrants" is certainly misleading if not a lie. Immigration in the centuries prior to WWII was negligible compared to post WWII. Put another way, it is not immigration as such that bothers ninety percent of those who complain about it, but the scale. Thus the statement that "we are a nation of immigrants" is an evasion of the issue. Or in most cases, a deliberate evasion, i.e. a lie."
Race? DNA?
If you look at the whitest of white UK citizens you'll find few whose DNA is of the peoples who lived here before the Saxons, Danes, Normans, Romans (the Romans deliberately brought peoples from different parts of their empire as soldiers - there was an Ethiopian Garrison apparently not too far away from where my house is now)
Did these peoples not intermix with the original Britons? Do you now understand why I introduce DNA? These were invading armies - not solitary immigrants or travellers to the land mass of the UK.
-- Now there's validation for you!
Please explain why you then introduced findings that there was institutional racism in the Met? What relevance does it have to the immigration cap?
-- Indeed, I believe it is you yourself who can say 'Aah, but where's your link?' when none are sometimes forthcoming!
Should I ask "where's your "relevant" link?" instead? Which is usually what I mean.
-- You know as well as I do that sometimes --
Just try and make it more relevant then. That's all I'm asking.