• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Sixth Circuit Stays Judge Taylor's Order: (1 Viewer)

Goobieman

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
17,343
Reaction score
2,876
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Sixth Circuit Stays Judge Taylor's Order:
The Sixth Circuit has issued a stay pending appeal of Judge Taylor's order requiring the government to shut down the NSA domestic surveillance program. I think it's hard to read too much into that, although note that the Sixth Circuit standards do incorporate one aspect of the merits: the stay indicates that this particular panel thought that DOJ had raised at least "serious questions" about the correctness of Judge Taylor's order shutting down the program.

http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_10_01-2006_10_07.shtml#1160005026

The stay:
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/internet/documents/Order062095_000.pdf

If the 6C holds to its own precedent, it'll overturn the decision -- which is why I wasn't terribly perturbed by the decision in the first place.

What will the "wait until it gets to court" people say?
 
Is this where the right comes along and starts in with their "activist judges" banter? :mrgreen:
 
Captain America said:
Is this where the right comes along and starts in with their "activist judges" banter? :mrgreen:

As noted, the 6C is/was working under established precedent.
So, no. If anything, the left will charge "activism".
 
Goobieman said:
As noted, the 6C is/was working under established precedent.
So, no. If anything, the left will charge "activism".

I think it's only considered "activism" when it's the left doing it. Y'know. Kinda like, it's only racism if it's whitey that's doing it? :rofl
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom