You need to name and explain this breach of ethics. I've a feeling it's more of a breach of liberal dogma.
At least 5 of the 7 Catholics on the SC Bench are no longer practicing any sort of recognizable juris prudence from the Bench that we would recognize as evidenced by their majority opinion in Dobbs v Jackson. Remember, this is a country built on the principle of separation of church and state. That is it in a nutshell.
At least 5 of the 7 Catholics on the SC Bench are radical religious zealots that carry their zealotry to the SC Bench again evidenced by their majority opinion in Dobbs v Jackson.
6 of the 7 Catholic SC justices are considered "Conservative Justices. That leaves 1 Catholic Justice on the Liberal end of the Bench. !00% of the 7 Conservatives are Catholics. 33% of the 3 Liberals are Catholics.
Now you have to know something about the Catholic Religion to recognize what a bind the country is in as a result. There is no half way to Catholicism. You are either all the way in or all the way out. You are simply acknowledging that you are a lapsed Catholic, excommunication be damned or all in for Catholicism. What is left in the middle are the Conflicted. Joe Biden for example is a conflicted Catholic, unsure if there even is a middle (earth to Joe, there is not) forever trying to determine whether they should be all the way in or all the way out. Conflicted is an unsustainable position.
Take an issue like Abortion for example. Take a look at the quote that follows. For those that do not know it "Latae sentential" means in simplest terms, AUTOMATIC or DE FACTO:
"The 1917 Code of Canon Law punished abortion with excommunication. The revised canonical legislation continues this tradition when it decrees that a person who actually procures an abortion incurs automatic (
Latae sententiae) excommunication" (Canon 1398) " The excommunication affects all those who commit this crime with knowledge of the penalty attached and thus includes those accomplices without whose help the crime would not have been committed" (Canon 1329)."
Now look at the quote in its entirety and think about who would fall under the ax of excommunication according to Catholic Church Canon. That would be the person that gets the Abortion and anybody that assists. That can be any doctor, any nurse, any practitioner, any politician and ANY JUDGE OR JUSTICE. Clearly supporting a woman's right to choose in any aspect would be assisting and thus if Catholic, you are automatically excommunicated in all cases.
While we haggle some about if Donald Trump would have presented us with a Constitutional Crisis or if he possibly already has, The Supreme Court is already presenting us with a Constitutional Crisis in the form of 6 justices that are clearly all the way in on Catholicism and no longer apply recognizable juris prudence for a country built on the principle of separation of church and state. The 6 that voted in the Majority in Dobbs v Jackson are clearly NOT CONFLICTED and they certainly are not LAPSED Catholics. The only other option is all the way in, a religious zealot incapable of separating their religious zealotry from their function on the SC.
This also makes for interesting thoughts regarding the relationship between WASP's and Catholics. How did we end up with 7 Catholic Justices on the SC. Only 22% of US Citizens identify as Catholic. How the hell does that roll into 78% of the SC being Catholic. I have two thoughts on that:
1) Catholics tend to go into Law and Academics while a higher percentage of WASP's go into business
2) WASP's while constantly yammering about being unable to "trust" Catholics in America because they bow to the Pointy Hat in Rome are happy to allow Catholics to carry their water for them.
