- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,813
- Reaction score
- 2,233
- Location
- Huntsville, AL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Greater consequences derive from getting into a war that has no public support. The One needs to go find himself a popular war if we are to bleed from the Treasury as well as from the bodies of American men and women in uniform.All I'm doing is pointing out the historical evidence thar proves inaction to a threat has negative concequences.
Yup. And live on CNN, too. This would be the end result, I believe:
What do you mean backing down? There are only two idiots calling for war, one is Obama, the other is the senile McCain. Peas in a pod.Backing down, now, isn!t an option.
Much better. Most men, and some women, will approve of the plan now. It's firming up nicely, and I can get my hands around it.Do you mean something like this:
If Iran is the problem have you considered making the fight about Iran?There's a helluva lot to be lost by backing down. We back down in the 90's and in 2001 we were attacked and lost 3,000 Americans. Iran has already threatened to attack the US embassy in Baghdad and to rape Obama's daughters.
You're missing the picture. The point, is that Obama made a threat. Failure to carry it out will be exploited by the bad guys.
Israel has nuclear weapons. I recommend she use them.Israel barely won, but tjat's no guarantee that they'll win the next one. The dynamics are totally different now.
Blowing things up isn't war, not for America at least.What do you mean backing down? There are only two idiots calling for war, one is Obama, the other is the senile McCain. Peas in a pod.
In my opinion the Congress has no intention of voting. If the Congress rightly votes not to waste our resources in Syria and the prez chooses to then they must go after him. On the other hand if they do nothing and the prez wastes the resources they can wring their hands but in the end do nothing. I hate this president and I hate this Congress.When is the congress going to vote?
Washington's Solution:
IMO, there's a stronger chance of an invasion of Israel without a Syria attack than with it.
What's your vote?I hate these anonymous polls. I want to know who voted.
What's your vote?
I haven't been following.It isn't obvious? :lol:
I haven't been following.
I hate these anonymous polls. I want to know who voted.
How would you feel I would vote? Just wondering.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?