Hit Asaad hard from afar, just to let him know he is an asshole for what he ordered..
Boots on the ground? Never!
Explain to me just what you think this little mission is going to accomplish.
This has nothing to do with the media. Massacres happen all over the world, and the United States does nothing. Why do you think we want to get involved in this one?
What makes you think that lobbing a few bombs is going to change anything?
Anyone else other than the United States. I don't really care.
1) Well I cannot go ahead and explain to you my secret mission... Over nothing! Intel costs you know!
2) Divert the question to your President, Obama.
3) Refer to 2).
You bettya!
Thanks for not answering a single one of my questions. So, in other words, you don't know what's going on over there either. :lol: Then why are you so keen on the United States involving itself in this fiasco?
This is really stupid if you think about it. Basically we are telling this dictator that it's okay to kill the people, just not with certain types of weapons. :roll:
.I grew tired answering questions that you do not seem to read or comprehend. Thought I should just not take you seriously and joke a little instead. You turn better that way as it is apparent
What is there to think even. Gas infuriates everyone! Ever had someone release terrible gas while near you? Eating at a restaurant or so?
.
Look you need to stop with the insults right NOW. If you can't answer the questions, just say so. Don't put the blame on me. BTW, you have YET to answer any questions. I don't think you know what's going on here at all.
.
What's the difference if you are killed by a gas or any other method. The end results are the same. Dead people.
How do you survive around here?
Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
Explain to me just what you think this little mission is going to accomplish.
DDD's answer:
1) Well I cannot go ahead and explain to you my secret mission... Over nothing! Intel costs you know!
Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
This has nothing to do with the media. Massacres happen all over the world, and the United States does nothing. Why do you think we want to get involved in this one?
DDD's answer:
2) Divert the question to your President, Obama.
Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
What makes you think that lobbing a few bombs is going to change anything?
DDD's answer:
3) Refer to 2).
I do not think I can relate to you any longer. Perhaps someone else could give a try to tell you plain and simple what the difference between mass murder and combat murder may be, and why the earlier should be sanctioned compared to the later.
As several people have pointed out, Obama can use military force for 90 days without congressional approval. Asking for Congress permission is not to launch a few missiles. While Obama can say it's to launch a limited strike on Syria, Congressional approval will actually grant Obama sweeping wartime powers, which he'll abuse of course.
I survive by sticking to the topic and not letting people like you divert attention from it. I will show exactly what I'm talking about with you not able or unwilling to answer specific questions, and this just proves that you don't really know anything about the situation, so I cannot understand why you would defend this decision. Here is a copy of the questions I asked and the answers you gave.
And you are of the opinion that American troops should go in there and die and for the rest of us to be responsible for paying for it to assure this? Why?
Go back to my earlier responses that made me give up on you. There you will find answers. Post those and I may try to link lose dots for you.
Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
Of course they aren't going to listen to you, but you're trying to make the case as to why we should. Look at the poll results. Americans do NOT want to go there.
DDD's response:
It is not my intent to change the position of all of them here.
Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
Are you aware of all the other atrocities that are MUCH worse than this that occur in this world, and we DO NOT intervene. Why do you think that is? Why is this particular atrocity OUR problem now?
DDD's response:
It is selective media.
Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
If I wanted to stay away, don't you think I would? I want to talk about this. This concerns me directly. My tax dollars will pay for all of this stuff that I am against. It doesn't make any sense for us to intervene. There are others than can do it.
DDD's response:
So you do want to talk. Well then leave the rose colored glasses on the door and expect talking about a hell hole. See that is what it was all about. It is a hell hole because it is oppressed. Being oppressed keeps it being a hell hole. The intervention if done completely would unhell the hole in the long term if the population between Al-Qaeda and Assad are set free. If one were to choose places to intervene based on how appealing the places are there might not be any intervention at all.
You keep mentioning "others." Whom do you have in mind?
Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
And here you are, a person from another country, trying to push the United States into a war with Syria.
DDD's response:
I am afraid you give me too much power with that! LOL
Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
This stupid military action is NOT going to accomplish anything. The only purpose for this is for Obama to try to not look like a fool. Too late for that I think.
DDD's response:
What happened to the hell zone and the people suffering there? Are those issues not to be aligned with the purpose you mention?
Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
And another thing, don't you tell me to unsubscribe from this thread. I have more of a say of this than you do. I am a citizen of the United States.
DDD's response:
You are on a public forum lady. Your citizenship does not determines the amount of say you have on certain issues.
Agrees with what? DDD has the excuse of not having english as his first language (hah after Russian it's prolly his third) what's your excuse?Obama did the right thing and the GOP Congressional leadership agrees.
Perhaps it was this one.
You see here? You have not come up with any valid responses as to why we should make a move on Syria. If you'd like, I'll go back even further though, just to be sure. :mrgreen:
This much is fine thanks. So then, what is it that you do not understand? How do I not answer your questions?
I'll ask you this. 1) Why should Americans in particular spill blood 2) and spend money 3) on this particular problem 4) when there are and have been far worse atrocities?
And why do you think we should be responsible for what happens in Syria?
Why not your country? Why not the UK? Why not France? Why not the UN?
Agrees with what? DDD has the excuse of not having english as his first language (hah after Russian it's prolly his third) what's your excuse?
1) The risk of spilling blood with airstrikes exists of course. It is not that it is a kill free solution. But it is a small probability.
2) I thought about this too. You are already in dept why be pulled deeper in it right? It turns out that in the long run war ends up being more profiatble. It will actually gain you more money in the long run.
3) This particular problem has been chosen from the media. Not all every wrong doing can be put into the media at once. One at the time. Why this particular area was put in the media compared to say atrocities committed from Budhists in Burma may be due to your political leadership and their international policies and agendas.
4) If all were to be put at once then it may be too much of a burden. One at a time.
People are being gassed but it is not really about your responsibility. You did not gas those people to death hence you should not be responsible. But things there may escalate if not intervened in time. Basically you should be looking for that long term gain for your own interests. Those may in fact have to do with intervening on Syria.
Apart from UK and UN, this may end up a joint operation that may include the rest also.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?