George_Washington
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2005
- Messages
- 1,962
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
What do YOU think?
I think we should. Before you make up your mind, hear me out. I believe in the dealth penalty for our most viscious and sick criminals. I think that by making our executions public, they would not only instill respect for our government but would also scare criminals out of committing crimes. We could televise them, put them available for pay per view or something, or we could even have them in the middle of Times Square. Heck, we could even make a lot of money off of this. We could release, "The Best Executions of 2006" on DVD. :mrgreen:
Ask yourself: Why would public executions really be so wrong? People in Europe did it for hundreds of years. Are we really that much smarter than our fore fathers?
We are so lax on our prosecution of criminals in this country that it's almost laughable compared to a lot of other countries. The insertion of, "cruel and unusual" punishment that was placed in our constitution should be reconsidered. Our ancestors in old Europe and other places certainly believed in justice for the wicked. So why don't we?
If a sick and sadastic bastard rapes and murders 11 year old girls, what compassion does he deserve? This is such a horrible act that nobody who does that deserves compassion here on Earth. It is for God and God alone to grant him compassion in the next life. But here on Earth, our duty is only to bring justice to the victims' families.
I say for criminals such as these we should reconsider the use of medieval European punishment devices. We should also consider bringing back the placement of letters on criminals, as was done in Western Europe and parts of the American colonies in the 1700's and prior. Instead of using cloth letters as was done in the past, we could tattoo sex offenders on their foreheads so that they would live the rest of their lives in humiliation.
I think we should. Before you make up your mind, hear me out. I believe in the dealth penalty for our most viscious and sick criminals. I think that by making our executions public, they would not only instill respect for our government but would also scare criminals out of committing crimes. We could televise them, put them available for pay per view or something, or we could even have them in the middle of Times Square. Heck, we could even make a lot of money off of this. We could release, "The Best Executions of 2006" on DVD. :mrgreen:
Ask yourself: Why would public executions really be so wrong? People in Europe did it for hundreds of years. Are we really that much smarter than our fore fathers?
We are so lax on our prosecution of criminals in this country that it's almost laughable compared to a lot of other countries. The insertion of, "cruel and unusual" punishment that was placed in our constitution should be reconsidered. Our ancestors in old Europe and other places certainly believed in justice for the wicked. So why don't we?
If a sick and sadastic bastard rapes and murders 11 year old girls, what compassion does he deserve? This is such a horrible act that nobody who does that deserves compassion here on Earth. It is for God and God alone to grant him compassion in the next life. But here on Earth, our duty is only to bring justice to the victims' families.
I say for criminals such as these we should reconsider the use of medieval European punishment devices. We should also consider bringing back the placement of letters on criminals, as was done in Western Europe and parts of the American colonies in the 1700's and prior. Instead of using cloth letters as was done in the past, we could tattoo sex offenders on their foreheads so that they would live the rest of their lives in humiliation.