Like I said, this is exactly what someone who doesn't agree with him would say. But you have no substance, no criticism, not really anything to offer except for a bunch of fancy words, mixed in with age-old labels that have been used against him in his long career. If I were to come to a different conclusion about Chomsky, it wouldn't be due to you or anyone like you. The main problem here is that you haven't read any of his material. Most of the conclusions you come up with are based on thins that you've found on other websites. Let's face it, Chomsky isn't exactly something you read for fun. While other find it entertaining in the way that its informative or dissentive, you wouldn't bother with anything such as that. If you had read his work, then your insight would be a lot more interesting. One of the main reasons why I know you haven't read his work is because of you, and everyone else heres, labelling him. What else would you have to offer? If you truley read his work, would you not have used easier to understand, not so angry, cirticism which is normal to someone such as yourself? You are not, as I can see, an unintelligent person but you are forced to take the route of one who is ignorant because you refuse to figure out thins for yourself. If you, or anyone else, really has to offer some actual criticism, not hatred or bashing, but criticism, it can easily be understood and accepted. I wouild heartily debate, perhaps defending him at points and politely attack your points as well. However, as is, there is nothing here that can reach enlightement on either side. And why? Because your ranting is as boring as ****. You have nothing to offer except bullshit. You want to change my mind? Then do it the right way. Offer cirticism, politely yet articulately. With reasoning. Once you can do that I will consider what you say and perhaps use a rebuttal and thus we will debate. Your intellectual ignorance, however, is neither productive nor entertaining. It can only alienate people.