Navy Pride
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 39,883
- Reaction score
- 3,070
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Your Comments please:
aps said:I support the nomination. He has the qualifications. I don't think he is totally out of the mainstream as some dems have been saying.
Navy Pride said:The president could nominate God for the SCOTUS and the usual suspects, Kennedy, Kerry, Boxer, etc would say he is out of the mainstream.....
aps said:LOL Their voting against Roberts was just plain stupid.
Navy Pride said:The president could nominate God for the SCOTUS and the usual suspects, Kennedy, Kerry, Boxer, etc would say he is out of the mainstream.....
And they would be right! God has no place on the Supreme Court.Navy Pride said:The president could nominate God for the SCOTUS and the usual suspects, Kennedy, Kerry, Boxer, etc would say he is out of the mainstream.....
hipsterdufus said:Would God be for or against separation of chuch and state?
I wonder...
Of course there's no privacy if he/she knows all and sees all.
:mrgreen:
Navy Pride said:hips, it was just and expression, point being no matter who President Bush nominates the usual suspects, Kennedy, Kerry, and Boxer would vote nay.......
SKILMATIC said:I would have to say we should wait till we know what and how he stands on the constitution. I cant make a decision if I dont know what/how he stands.
SKILMATIC said:I would have to say we should wait till we know what and how he stands on the constitution. I cant make a decision if I dont know what/how he stands.
when he stated that the commerce clause doesn't empower the Congress to ban machine guns I knew he was worth confirming
Skil, I don't have to wait.......Anyone who has been a member of the Federalist Society is good enough for me......
Navy Pride said:Skil, I don't have to wait.......Anyone who has been a member of the Federalist Society is good enough for me......
SKILMATIC said:What? You mean I can now own a M4A1 in cali? Damn! I just bought a Colt 45 1911. O well theres always next paycheck :lol:
Yeah well Federalists were always strict constitutionalists. So I guess thsts a good thing.
TurtleDude said:stupidest thing I ever did was turn down a chance to be a founder. My roommate in college was Peter Keisler and three other founders (Calabresi, McIntosh, and Lieberman [Otis]) were good good friends. Steve Calabresi called me when I was at cornell asking if I wanted to help get this thing going-I was too busy serving as a squash coach and in all honesty, didn't think it would fly given how leftwing so many law students were (the conservatives seemed interested in only getting call backs and summer jobs at Sullivan and Cromwell or Hughes Hubbard and Reed) but I agree with you-I have been a member for years
SKILMATIC said:I ma sure you have done much more stupider things than that. :2wave:
TurtleDude said:Probably but not scoring one night or two as a college boy didn't have any lasting regrets :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
SKILMATIC said::lol: Well scoring as a college boy is harmony at its best.
TurtleDude said:depends what you take away from it and if the doctor at the clinic could deal with it:mrgreen:
gwynn said:While it can be fun to watch threads degenerate..
Back to the original question, I think it would be premature to state anything until the senate hearings are done. He is qualified, but there are still questions about where he sits on some constitutional points. To say anything either way at this point is blatant partisanship.
I completely agree.debate_junkie said:And the end all, abortion is not and should not be the ONLY stance to qualify or disqualify a candidate. That just makes me crazy. I could care less if someone is pro life or pro choice, as long as they are going to follow the law of the constitution.