• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should the contents of the alleged Hunter Biden laptop be publicly released?

Should the contents of the alleged Hunter Biden laptop be publicly released?

  • No, the super rich are correct and the topic must be totally censored and outlawed forever.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17
The Bidens havent denied that the emails are not theirs, and the FBI has concluded it isnt Russian disinformation. Common sense tells us where there is smoke, there is fire.


You have no proof that the FBI concluded as you say. None. Common sense tells us you have to back up your own words.
 
That does not say what you are claiming it says.
Yes it does. The FBI doesnt disagree with the DNI, who said it wasnt Russian misinformation. Truth hurts, dont it?
 
Yes it does. The FBI doesnt disagree with the DNI, who said it wasnt Russian misinformation. Truth hurts, dont it?
and the DNI didn't really say anything either. They did not confirm that it was Hunter Biden's or that he is even under investigation.
 
and the DNI didn't really say anything either. They did not confirm that it was Hunter Biden's or that he is even under investigation.
No one has confirmed a crime has been committed.


No one
 
No one has confirmed a crime has been committed. No one

I am guessing that what 'investigations' are for. And something that is missing 'investigation reporting' by a MSM that seem disinterested.
 
I am guessing that what 'investigations' are for. And something that is missing 'investigation reporting' by a MSM that seem disinterested.
So nothing yet
I agree
 
DILLIGAF? One thing for sure, when it comes to presidential children running around getting rich off of daddy's power, Ivanka is a helluva easier on the eyes. Also, Melania, 2/3's nude, in a slinky negligee, takes MUCH better photos.
 
and the DNI didn't really say anything either. They did not confirm that it was Hunter Biden's or that he is even under investigation.
Wrong, the DNI said that it wasnt Russian disinformation.
I guess you can't comprehend the news you read. Nothing in the article you link says that the FBI came to such conclusion as you say. The FBI did not say as you claim. The FBI saying "nothing to add" is like the CIA saying "we can neither confirm or deny". Your claim is false.

Read post #104 and stop wasting my time.
 
Wrong, the DNI said that it wasnt Russian disinformation.


Read post #104 and stop wasting my time.


The FBI did not say they agree with the DNI stating the disk content was not Russian disinformation. You can't prove otherwise. You can't prove the FBI stated what you falsely said they did. Without the evidence that is your burden of proof, your claim is unfounded and need not be debated further. Bliss of the ignorance you cling to protects you from any hurt the truth may bring, I suppose.
 
Exactly, and they think that this non confirmation is proof that a crime was committed.

Whether "a crime was committed" is not the only issue, is it?

For all the rabid ranting against Amy Barrett, what crime was she accused of? NONE. Therefore, there was NO reason for any Democrat in the Senate not to vote for her.
 
Actually when the MSM hides the evidence, it does not mean it is debunked. Oh there is plenty of evidence and this is why the Biden crime family is not denying this.

You've been spoiled by Trump always playing victim. There's a whole world of people out there that don't waste time denying what they know isn't true.
 
From a partisan web site....gee I am overly surprised. Attack.com
You're not denying Ratcliffe is a liar are you? Her is a description of your 'partisan' website...

"Above the Law is the biggest site for original legal news, counting among its readers everyone from general counsels and senior partners at the nation’s biggest firms to the ranks of 1Ls. Written by lawyers for lawyers, Above the Law’s staff blankets institutions like the Supreme Court, law school, and life at big firms. It’s the first with salary and bonus information and is a hub of professional advice for legal professionals at all career stages."

It surprises me that djt defenders call everyone liars but djt.
 
Wrong, the DNI said that it wasnt Russian disinformation.


Read post #104 and stop wasting my time.
I believe the DNI said they were NOT investigating the laptop, period. Which means they haven't been involved, so how would they know one way or the other?
 
Well if you show the laptop as evidence as to just how low trump is willing to go to win this election.

Fabricating a story like this is criminal. Is it only Giuliani that can be charged with this? Another trump sycophant takes the fall.
 
Nearly all of the MSM, press and Internet owned by the richest people on earth have banned any and all even investigation into the alleged Hunter Biden laptop. The Bidens refuse to deny the authenticity - and both have now going entirely into hiding at least until Friday. Yet if true, the Bidens are the worst traitors in American history. Zero evidence has shown any Russian involvement, nor does it matter. What matters is whether the emails and documents are authentic.

Should the contents of the alleged Hunter Biden laptop be publicly released?

No one cares except those that consume fact-free, right wing political porn. Have at it.
 
No one cares except those that consume fact-free, right wing political porn. Have at it.

You have been ordered by Joe Biden to never care about or even accept facts. But that's just a rule for Democrats even according to Biden. Everyone but progressive Democrats (corporate-fascism) still is allowed to hear and consider facts. You are not.
 
From a partisan web site....gee I am overly surprised. Attack.com


What was claimed in the article that is false based on what evidence you can provide?
 
Back
Top Bottom