• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Should terrorist be cremated instead of buried? (1 Viewer)

Should terrorist be cremated instead of buried?


  • Total voters
    8

jamesrage

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
36,705
Reaction score
17,870
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
I do not know if this topic ever came up,if it has please merge it with the other thread.


A simple yes or no question.Do you think terrorist should be cremated instead of buried?Feel free to add any comments you want.
 
Leave them to rot where you shot them....

Or just dump them in a landfill.
 
chop them up in little pieces, fry them in butter, and feed them to wild dogs.

Or

Puree them with feces and spread them on toast, and eat them.

Or

Launch them into space with a very big catapult.
 
Who cares? If their immediate families can be found, it's their decision.
 
::Major_Baker:: said:
chop them up in little pieces, fry them in butter, and feed them to wild dogs..


My god you are such a dip! Buddy you really need to get a clue.

That is a waste or GOOD BUTTER. besides the hogs wont mind.
 
cherokee said:
My god you are such a dip! Buddy you really need to get a clue.

That is a waste or GOOD BUTTER. besides the hogs wont mind.
ok, use margarine instead. never did like that synthetic crap....

i am so confused as to the premise, or point of this thread.
 
::Major_Baker:: said:
i am so confused as to the premise, or point of this thread.

My thoughts exactly. Jamesrage, what exactly are we supposed to be debating/discussing here? Why does it matter?
 
Kandahar said:
Umm
Who cares?

1.)terrorist supporters who may want to turn his grave site into a shrine.
2.)other terrorist supporters and family.
3.)terrorist
 
Kandahar said:
My thoughts exactly. Jamesrage, what exactly are we supposed to be debating/discussing here? Why does it matter?

Should terrorist be buried according to their religious doctrine or something else.Do we have to give a **** about thier religion when disposing of such scum.
 
cherokee said:
Leave them to rot where you shot them....

Or just dump them in a landfill.

I say cremate the the dead terrorist and mix thier ashes with pig **** and sell it novelty fertalizer or perhaps mix their ashes with the wood pulp that is used to make toilet paper.
 
Judging from all of your posts, I don't think that you realize that 'terrorist' is the singular form of the word. When referring to multiple terrorists, you must add an "S'


I say if someone claims his body, let them do as they will. If noone claims him, burn it up I guess! Cemetaries are a waste of resources anyways.
 
Hoot said:
Who cares? If their immediate families can be found, it's their decision.

Why should such scum have the liberty of being buried or taken care of according to their families wishes?
 
jamesrage said:
Why should such scum have the liberty of being buried or taken care of according to their families wishes?

Because they presumably haven't been convicted of terrorist activities. And I'd rather not waste taxpayer money and tie up the legal system to posthumously convict a terrorist (if that's even legal), for a reason as trivial as this.

Why didn't you just ask if they should be taken care of in accordance with their families' wishes? Who cares what the method of disposal is?
 
Last edited:
jamesrage said:
I say cremate the the dead terrorist and mix thier ashes with pig **** and sell it novelty fertalizer or perhaps mix their ashes with the wood pulp that is used to make toilet paper.


Its sad but true I'll never win any humanitarian awards.
So with that said…My reply to the above post is..


:lamo :2rofll: :2funny: :lamo
 
Kandahar said:
Because they presumably haven't been convicted of terrorist activities. And I'd rather not waste taxpayer money and tie up the legal system to posthumously convict a terrorist (if that's even legal), for a reason as trivial as this.

What about the recent deaths of known terrorist?


Who cares what the method of disposal is?

Most of these terrorist are muslims extreamist and would not want their remains desicrated and beleave in being buried.So **** screw what their families want and what their religion says.Terrorist like Osama should not have a proper muslim burial.
 
cherokee said:
Its sad but true I'll never win any humanitarian awards.
So with that said…My reply to the above post is..


:lamo :2rofll: :2funny: :lamo

If these terrorist feel that being cremeted somehow prevents them from going to heaven then why not cremate them and why not add alot of insult to injury?I think alot of these terrorist would be horrified knowing that they would be turned into **** paper or pig dung fertalizer.
 
jamesrage said:
If these terrorist feel that being cremeted somehow prevents them from going to heaven then why not cremate them and why not add alot of insult to injury?I think alot of these terrorist would be horrified knowing that they would be turned into **** paper or pig dung fertalizer.

I have a morbid idea..

4 cups of dead cremated terrorist.
2 cups of fried and diced beacon
3 cups of mad dog 20/20

Blend the ingredients until you have a fine paste then mix well into your soil for your flower garden.
 
Well first off since they are a Terrorist, im not quite sure if they deserve to choose to be cremated or buried. But also since they are dead its kind of irrellevent on how to dispose of the body because well as you know that they are dead, and they wont be a problem anymore. Bringing this up would cause problems in a already problem filled process.
 
Lazel said:
But also since they are dead its kind of irrellevent on how to dispose of the body because well as you know that they are dead, and they wont be a problem anymore.

THere are alot of people in the world that are concerned with how their body will be treated when they die.So in way it does matter if these terrorist want to be buried so that their grave site will be turned into a shrine.



Bringing this up would cause problems in a already problem filled process.


I think this is one of those your damned if you do and your damned if you don't situations.
 
jamesrage said:
What about the recent deaths of known terrorist?

There's the question of who decides who is a "known terrorist" if they haven't been convicted of anything. Innocent until proven guilty and whatnot. Once we let the executive start making those decisions, we have a dangerous threat to separation of powers.

jamesrage said:
Most of these terrorist are muslims extreamist and would not want their remains desicrated and beleave in being buried.So **** screw what their families want and what their religion says.Terrorist like Osama should not have a proper muslim burial.

Ah, so we're specifically talking about Islamic extremism, not terrorism in general.

I don't think our government needs to anger the Muslim world for no reason. The fact that terrorists might not want their remains to be cremated is not a good enough reason for violating the wishes of their families. The threat of cremation is certainly not going to deter any terrorists. In short, nothing good comes from this, but it WOULD anger a lot of non-terrorists.
 
Kandahar said:
There's the question of who decides who is a "known terrorist" if they haven't been convicted of anything. Innocent until proven guilty and whatnot. Once we let the executive start making those decisions, we have a dangerous threat to separation of powers.
If Osama Bin Laden was killed in a Rocket attack should he be cremated or buried according to muslim tradition?



Ah, so we're specifically talking about Islamic extremism, not terrorism in general.

no,I am talking about terrorist.


I don't think our government needs to anger the Muslim world for no reason. The fact that terrorists might not want their remains to be cremated is not a good enough reason for violating the wishes of their families. The threat of cremation is certainly not going to deter any terrorists. In short, nothing good comes from this, but it WOULD anger a lot of non-terrorists.

If non-terrorist want to be angry over a terrorist being cremated then their alligiance will be exposed.
 
Jamesrage,

Do you realize that when talking about multiple (meaning more than one) terrorist, you should add an "S" on the end, so that it reads, "terrorists".

That would make it proper.

And as for this thread, this is the dumbest question I have ever heard. In fact, if terrorsts heard or read this, it would be giving aid to the enemy.

Talking about this is no different from newspapers reporting about GITMO soldiers "supposedly" flushing Korans down the toilet and what not. Its something that will anger the enemy, and unite them, thus this is giving aid to the enemy, and is considered treason.

(Mwuhahaha.. do you like my Conservo-tard :spin: tactics?)
 
jamesrage said:
If Osama Bin Laden was killed in a Rocket attack should he be cremated or buried according to muslim tradition?

Once dead, he should be buried according to Muslim Tradition. To not do so will only bring insult to Muslims and not every Muslim is a terrorist so why disrespect an entire religion for one man?

Once dead, the body is nothing but a shell, would desecrating it really give that much pleasure to you? I know it wouldn't me because the man that did those horrible things would be gone.
 
jamesrage said:
If Osama Bin Laden was killed in a Rocket attack should he be cremated or buried according to muslim tradition?

I don't know, nor do I care. Whatever his family wants.

jamesrage said:
no,I am talking about terrorist.

Obviously you're talking about Islamic terrorists specifically. Somehow I don't think the violation of Muslim sensibilities is going to have quite the same effect on right-wing skinhead terrorists or left-wing narcoterrorists.

jamesrage said:
If non-terrorist want to be angry over a terrorist being cremated then their alligiance will be exposed.

That is so completely idiotic it's not even worthy of response.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom