If your kids are doing things like that, then perhaps you need to do a better job of raising them instead of expecting a machine to do it for you.
Again this requires, clearly so that he can simply argue for the sake of it, that kids means "teenagers" or post teens. I have noticed with Kandahar that he attempts to set the perimeters of the argument quickly and in a truly narrow way.If your kid finds out about the hidden GPS (which they probably will if you call them out on doing something they weren't supposed to do), they'll never trust you again. If people would raise their kids properly, then maybe they wouldn't NEED to resort to gross invasions of their kids' privacy. :roll:
In May 1995, the Washington Post reported that Prince William was implanted with a gps tracking chip at the age of twelve.
I'm not sure if Harry was too; if so, I wonder what implications it would have for his soldiering career. He actually served in Afghanistan for a period of time. If his minders and caretakers can track him, so probably can his enemies.
it's a plain waste of money, humanity and its children has survived for hundreds of thousands of years without GPS devices, and kids have a right to privacy of there own, it eases the minds of the parents, but the toll it takes on the kids could be bad, it could eliminate the risks people take as part of coming of age and seeking independence.
I wonder how children are gonna turn out.The amount of elbow pads and safety gear you see them wearing when they are on bikes and stuff.
Parents can have such an obsession with their kids it can become unhealthy.
Not unless his enemies have a tremendous amount of "inside intel" and I mean a TREMENDOUS amount. So much so as not to be anymore a "worry" than the statistical mumbo jumbo which fueled Kandahar's prior ignorant screed. I'd say good try, but NOT SO MUCH.:shock:In May 1995, the Washington Post reported that Prince William was implanted with a gps tracking chip at the age of twelve.
I'm not sure if Harry was too; if so, I wonder what implications it would have for his soldiering career. He actually served in Afghanistan for a period of time. If his minders and caretakers can track him, so probably can his enemies.
It is not a waste of money if a parent chooses to utilize the tool. That is an entirely subjective argument, negated the nanosecond a missing child is located via these means. Oh wait, I forgot about the larger crime that moron Kandahar swears somehow exist otherwise. Privacy for the two, three, four, five, six, seven and name it all the way up to "tween" years old!it's a plain waste of money, humanity and its children has survived for hundreds of thousands of years without GPS devices, and kids have a right to privacy of there own, it eases the minds of the parents, but the toll it takes on the kids could be bad, it could eliminate the risks people take as part of coming of age and seeking independence.
Children do not have a right to privacy and it takes NO toll on the child. Such a device does not stop someone from taking risks....unless the risks you're talking about is breaking rules and laws? In which case that would be a good thing.
You mean to say parents don't "own" their offspring? Thanks be to God someone showed up to state the really important points that escape us all. What next? We don't need to breath oxygen except when we want to maintain a heartbeat?yes but i would also argue that parents dont own their children in all circumstances.
You mean to say parents don't "own" their offspring? Thanks be to God someone showed up to state the really important points that escape us all. What next? We don't need to breath oxygen except when we want to maintain a heartbeat?
No and of course this is not the case and such behavior is in fact at this time a crime. You know that right?Nothing to do with what im saying.For example if parents where to sexually abuse their children should that be ok because they are their children,or should the state take them from them?
yes but i would also argue that parents dont own their children in all circumstances.
I would not argue with you either, except of course if you too are making the knee jerk leap to the idea that use of a simple tool, one which will provide parents with a location via the GPS system, equates either "control" or "paranoia."I'd argue that there is a large difference between things can can legally do to their kids, and stuff that are a good idea. While throwing a GPS tracker on your kid strikes me as overly paranoid and controlling, it really isn't serious enough for the government to get involved. Bad parenting isn't a crime, but that doesn't make it above criticism either.
'Little Buddy' GPS device keeps tabs on your kid :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Technology
Should parents use a device like this to keep track of and monitor their children?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?