I am going to go with no, mainly due to my personal experience.
I used to be a mod on a political minded gaming forum, after a while there were suggestions like yours right now. I was appointed and those of us who were appointed kept our positions but new "community mods" were added. All it did was cause a whole bunch of drama and a headache for the owner as well as us appointed mods. It added bureaucracy to an internet forum, completely unnecessary.
All it will cause is factionalization and drama.
I am going to go with no, mainly due to my personal experience.
I used to be a mod on a political minded gaming forum, after a while there were suggestions like yours right now. I was appointed and those of us who were appointed kept our positions but new "community mods" were added. All it did was cause a whole bunch of drama and a headache for the owner as well as us appointed mods. It added bureaucracy to an internet forum, completely unnecessary.
All it will cause is factionalization and drama.
Bureaucracy, factionalilzation and drama happens at every electionNo taxation without representation. No modding without representation.
This is also an internet forum, not a country.
True but it is still a community.
It is a community, but I do not think it needs democratic representation because it just does not matter. The site functions perfectly fine regardless. All it will do is divide the community.
If I owned and operated a site like this, or any site for that matter, I would do what I god damn please with it. If people don't like the mods, that the powers that be have selected, go to another site. Simple as that. This ain't even up for negotiation, if I had my way. But I don't. This ain't MY site. If there ever comes a day I can't deal with the rules and regulations or moderation, I will politely make my discreet exit.
No. Mods need to be unbiased, intelligent, fair minded and able to work as part of a team. These are things you generally don't find in the sort of people who'd stand for election for a position of authority on the internet.
I think every community deserves democratic representation whether it be an internet forum, a school board or a country. It functions fine now but that would be like saying the lights still work in communist China. The community is already divided along their opinions so why can't those opinions be represented in the modding team?
I must say the current mods will probably dislike this thread being made.
If it ain't broke....
Well has anyone even asked the owner? If he refuses fair enough he owns the site.
Which was likely your reason for starting it to begin with.
True but it is still a community.
I think every community deserves democratic representation whether it be an internet forum, a school board or a country. It functions fine now but that would be like saying the lights still work in communist China. The community is already divided along their opinions so why can't those opinions be represented in the modding team?
I must say the current mods will probably dislike this thread being made.
Not really I just don't like the mods being unelected.