- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 65,981
- Reaction score
- 23,408
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Often, prolifers and prolife politicians claim that the government should not be allowed to spend money on abortions because that is contrary to some people's religious beliefs. And often spending laws and regulations are passed accordingly - claiming this is respecting people's beliefs and not making them pay for matters against their beliefs on abortion.
Laws that restrict, inhibit, confound or make abortions more difficult to obtain are against my beliefs. Should I also be able to demand the government spend no money on abortion matters contrary to my beliefs, ie no money be spend enforcing any anti-abortion laws.
If government bans spending money as prolifer's want it banned as violating their beliefs, should prochoicers equally be respected our beliefs in wanting government spending on anti-abortion actions banned?
What do you think?
Laws that restrict, inhibit, confound or make abortions more difficult to obtain are against my beliefs. Should I also be able to demand the government spend no money on abortion matters contrary to my beliefs, ie no money be spend enforcing any anti-abortion laws.
If government bans spending money as prolifer's want it banned as violating their beliefs, should prochoicers equally be respected our beliefs in wanting government spending on anti-abortion actions banned?
What do you think?
Last edited: