I think not. In my mind, a for life position invites arrogance and corruption.
That's a hard NO.I think not. In my mind, a for life position invites arrogance and corruption.
I think 4-6 year terms max and only two consecutive.I think 14 year terms for Federal Article III judges with the possibility of a second appointment to the bench is just fine. This is what is done for bankruptcy judges and it works just fine.
Congressional term limits violate the constitution. Are you a gun grabber too?NO.
That's why the two terms for President is fine.
In fact, maybe a one term of six years (as is the case in the United States of Mexico) is better.
Supreme Court Justices (and maybe ALL justices) should never be on the bench for more than 20 years.
And there should be term limits for every elective position. A certain gentleman from Delaware served much too long in the Senate. Just as a certain young(-looking) lady from California in the House needs to pack it in.
Then change the Constitution.Congressional term limits violate the constitution. Are you a gun grabber too?
And Clarence Thomas is the poster child.I think not. In my mind, a for life position invites arrogance and corruption.