• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should a president be able to strip the citizenship of a natural born citizen for saying things he doesn't like?

If I could, I would give you a thousand "likes" on the above. It is what I have said for decades. Unfortunately, the fact that there are so many who reflect the Felon's ideas, cheer them, is what I was unprepared for. I guess they have always been out there but only feel safe now to show us what racist, unempathetic, ignorant people they really are.
 

Good points. Libertarianism is a phase. Unfortunately, some of them (usually cis white men) don't grow out of it.
 
I didn't say that.
 
She can speak her mind, but needs to be held accountable for slander when warranted.
 

By no means, anywhere, have I ever even implied that TACO considers himself bound to the Const or judicial decision. I was merely providing the law as I understand it. I have written many times that he's been grooming and intimidating the US justice system, enforcement agencies, and military since he took office. There will be those that fail their oath to our country and do his bidding.
 

****ing Moron
 

Trade deals? Meh! Who needs 'em!

This is what the President of the United States should be doing with his time!
 
Look at how many democrat politicians you would have to do the same to.
Whataboutwhataboutwhatabout
His words were not to start a riot. It was a sentiment. He was still giving his speech a long distance away when all that started.
He called on his minions to put a stop to the certification. They tried. He watched the riot unfold on TV and DID NOTHING for three hours. He literally enjoyed it. Afterwards he told the rioters he loved them.
I think only a small handful if any should have been pardoned. The only reason i see to release all of them is because it became political, and the sentences were too harsh.

Rule of law. You and your King Joffrey have no use for it.
 
So he can speak his mind but Rosie O' Donnell can't?

I didn't say that.

But trump is saying that.

She can speak her mind, but needs to be held accountable for slander when warranted.
There's a legal remedy available to those who feel they have been slandered. You know that.

You also know that trump is NOT referring to the legal remedy for slander.

So, in essence, at this point, you sure do seem to be dismissing as "meh", if not outright supporting, trump's talk about stripping citizenship from an American citizen because he, trump, does not like what the citizen has been saying.
 
Lord of Planar said:
He speaks his mind.
So?


The is tactic approval.

When the next President "speaks his mind," and deports you and every other MAGA, none of us will "speak our minds" in your defense. Because you guys are all terrible people who deserve the worst.
Post #211


It sure is tacit approval of a President's talk re taking citizenship away from people whose "talk" the POTUS doesn't like.

Tacit approval of something that is anti-American.
 
The indoctrination and brainwashing is strong in you.
 
The indoctrination and brainwashing is strong in you.
Post #220


Not so strong as in your posts.

Look up. You've given tacit approval of trump's threat to take the citizenship away from those whose talk he doesn't like.

Free speech is one of the hallmarks of our democracy. Yet the minute trump starts talking about punishing a citizen for using this civil right, you try to pretend that all trump was talking about was a legal remedy re "slander" (Post #209).

Shame on you. You know that's not the situation. But that doesn't stop you from trying to dismiss what trump said. You're covering for him.
 
But you said she shouldn't be here. Are you softening on that stance?
I specifically stated it as my "sentiment."

Do you comprehend English? Words have meaning.
 
I specifically stated it as my "sentiment."

Do you comprehend English? Words have meaning.
Post #222


You sure don't appear to comprehend the meaning of "slander". Is that the problem here? Or is it that loyalty to anything and everything trump says is your foremost priority?

Trying to dismiss trump's anti-free-speech threat as a reaction to supposed "slander" (for which there are legal remedies) is pathetic. It's not at all standing up for our democracy. For free speech rights.

It's pandering to trump. Putting allegiance to trump ahead of the basic rights of our democracy.
 
Yes.

I am not aware of the magnets in water, but wind power can cause cancer. the blades erode in the wind. Those aerosols of epoxy and fiberglass and who knows what else can enter a person's lungs, and water supply.
Citation please. I will be fascinated to read how wind turbines are responsible for cancer based on blades eroding compared to the far more numerous metal structures we have.


Link please.
Sure:


Article:


Enjoy!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…