KCConservative
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2005
- Messages
- 2,669
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Despite it being so long ago, it seems this silly debate continues. So which is it?
KCConservative said:Despite it being so long ago, it seems this silly debate continues. So which is it?
Hoot said:I shouldn't get started on this, but Clinton was impeached because of the republicans' fanatical lust for power at any expense to our nation.
Clinton was impeached because a dirty and biased prosecutor, who failed to find any wrong doing on a bogus real estate case, happened upon a sexual impropriety.
Clinton was impeached because biased members of the Supreme Court erroneously ruled that a civil court case be allowed to proceed against a sitting president...rather then realizing the greater good for our nation is to have a President not tied up in civil court proceedings, but to grant a "stay," or delay, to this civil case until after the President fullfills his constitutionally elected duties.
If they can impeach Clinton for lying about a perfectly legal sexual impropriety, and they can threaten impeachment of Nixon for his coverup in the Watergate scandal, then Bush should be impeached 10 times over for his lying to the American public about taking our nation to war, his lying about the leaking of Plame, and his lying about his association with Abramoff, among many other lies...too numerous to mention here.
Hoot said:Bush should be impeached 10 times over for his lying to the American public about taking our nation to war, his lying about the leaking of Plame, and his lying about his association with Abramoff, among many other lies...too numerous to mention here.
americanwoman said:Well he did lie about it but since he did not actually have "sexual relations" I can't say he lied about sex because I guess I don't consider a blow job sex.
Hoot said:Well..gee..err...ahh...what are you doing Saturday night?
Hoot said:Well..gee..err...ahh...what are you doing Saturday night?
doughgirl said:americanwoman said,"Well he did lie about it but since he did not actually have "sexual relations" I can't say he lied about sex because I guess I don't consider a blow job sex."
So you wouldnt care if you came home and the neighbor woman was in your bedroom servicing your husband by giving him a blow job?
Man Iv'e heard it all.
americanwoman said:servicing my boyfriend:lol:
earthworm said:We need to have a higher caliber of men in politics; the whole election process must be reformed..
americanwoman said:**** yeah I would care you frickin idiot -that would be cheating! If Bill Clinton was married to me I would have chopped his balls off. But he was talking to a jury about having sex--not his wife-- and he did not have sex with Monica. She gave him a blow job. That is not sexual intercourse, genuis.So how can I say he lied about having sex. That is not my husband- which I don't even have- so I don't really care if someone else was giving him head. It's not a personal matter for me. My boyfriend wouldn't be getting head from anyone else because I give him plenty. Do you need some pointers how to keep your man sastified?
Interesting. Maybe you could explain this:saffron said:He Wasn't impeached you idiots!
would someone either move this thread to the basement or make a new category called "If You Are an Idiot....!"![]()
heh heh hehKCConservative said:Now, what were you saying about idiots?
DeeJayH said:using your vernacular
your logic is retarded you freakin idiot
are you saying a pervert can get oral from a 10 year old because it is not sex?
are you saying all those priests did nothing wrong, atleast the ones who only had oral with little boys
if you have contact with a sexual organ, and achieve orgasm you just had sex
hell even if a man gets blue balled because the skank would not complete the act, they still engaged in sex
whether it is intercourse ORAL SEX or anal
notice what it is called, ORAL SEX?
ITS SEX YOU RUBBER
you must be one of those people who doesn't think prostitutes are prostitutes when they say the money they are paid is just for conversation, and any other acts that are commited are a bonus, and not a result of payment for those services
:roll: :doh
where do they grow people like you?
query- was this moved to the basement yet, cause if not, it is over due
Hoot said:I shouldn't get started on this, but Clinton was impeached because of the republicans' fanatical lust for power at any expense to our nation.
Clinton was impeached because a dirty and biased prosecutor, who failed to find any wrong doing on a bogus real estate case, happened upon a sexual impropriety.
Clinton was impeached because biased members of the Supreme Court erroneously ruled that a civil court case be allowed to proceed against a sitting president...rather then realizing the greater good for our nation is to have a President not tied up in civil court proceedings, but to grant a "stay," or delay, to this civil case until after the President fullfills his constitutionally elected duties.
If they can impeach Clinton for lying about a perfectly legal sexual impropriety, and they can threaten impeachment of Nixon for his coverup in the Watergate scandal, then Bush should be impeached 10 times over for his lying to the American public about taking our nation to war, his lying about the leaking of Plame, and his lying about his association with Abramoff, among many other lies...too numerous to mention here.
americanwoman said:OK- those guys are sick pervs who are CHILD MOLESTORS!! people who get paid for sex are prostitutes. If two people want to engage safe sex whats it to you? what never had your dick sucked and your just hatin? and whats up with all the gay child references? what brought that in?
I guess you need to be reminded that President Clinton was found NOT GUILTY. An impeachment is simply an indictment. For example, if that lowlife asshole Tom DeLay is found not guilty will it be OK to act as if he was convicted?KCConservative said:Despite it being so long ago, it seems this silly debate continues. So which is it?
I didn't say or act like he was convicted. I said he was impeached, which he was. He was impeached in the House and remained in office. Look it up, champs. He was impeached and it makes you crazy. There's nothing you can do about it. You can't turn back time. Your hero lied to a federal grand jury, under oath, and it breaks your heart. Sorry, man.26 X World Champs said:I guess you need to be reminded that President Clinton was found NOT GUILTY. An impeachment is simply an indictment. For example, if that lowlife asshole Tom DeLay is found not guilty will it be OK to act as if he was convicted?
Do people in Red States have a problem with the TRUTH? He was found NOT GUILTY...are you able to grasp what NOT GUILTY means?KCConservative said:He was impeached and it makes you crazy. There's nothing you can do about it. You can't turn back time. Your hero lied to a federal grand jury, under oath, and it breaks your heart. Sorry, man.
26 X World Champs said:Do people in Red States have a problem with the TRUTH? He was found NOT GUILTY...are you able to grasp what NOT GUILTY means?
Let me guess you think Not Guilty means Guilty?
One more question? If it's proven that Don Vito Bush has lied should he be impeached? I seem to recall extreme right wingers such as yourself claimed that Clinton was impeached not for having sex but for lying? So if Bush lied, then what?